IcedTea6 1.6 Released!

[Andrew Haley]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> I'm not suggesting using it as the sole basis for merging; that would
> be wrong as you say.  But having a summary line better than 2009-08-27
>  Matthias Klose  <doko at ubuntu.com> or 2009-09-09  Andrew Haley
> <aph at redhat.com> would mean you can make a more educated guess as to
> whether it's worth looking at the entire changeset.

Sure, it's better for the person merging, but even more admin for the
person committing.  I think we have quite enough procedural rules without
this.

> You're always going to get this 1-line summary regardless, it would be
> good to have it as something sensible.

It would be nice, but every time we add more things that a committer
must do we make it harder for people to contribute.  This one isn't
worth it.

Andrew.