[PATCH] drop visualvm without OpenJDK build
Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Mon Sep 21 08:20:20 PDT 2009
2009/9/18 Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil at suse.cz>:
> Hi,
>
> due the constraints of our build system, which don't allow the cycle in build
> (there are a few exceptions, like openjdk itself, where it's allowed) I need
> to build visualvm later, due the netbeans dependency.
>
> The separate build is allowed by make visualvm, but the installation of it is
> hardcoded icedtea (icedtea-debug) targets. I moved it to extra target called
> drop-visualvm.
>
> Regards
> Michal Vyskocil
>
Thanks for your contribution. The idea here seems good in general.
IMO things like VisualVM, SystemTap support, etc. should be depended
on by the 'all' target rather than having this convoluted IcedTea
target (which is then duplicated in icedtea-ecj).
I'm planning to refactor our whole Makefile structure as a whole, so
I'll factor this in rather than applying the patch as is. I'll be
doing this on my personal branch:
http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/andrew/icedtea then porting the
results, once stable over to IcedTea6 and 7.
Thanks,
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list