For users of --with-openjdk

[DJ Lucas]

On 08/12/2010 07:41 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> They are.  I've been meaning to look at getting this work for a while, and having
> someone else looking too is good motivation ;-)
> 

So I wasn't able to put it down as I should have.  I noticed the FIXME
around MEMORY_LIMIT.  I wonder if something like the attached patch
would be sufficient for both (the choice of terminology is ugly I think,
but it was a quick patch).  I don't know a thing about Zero or Cacao,
and I haven't even tested this yet beyond making sure that configure is
sane and that it completes with the expected results in the Makefile.
As to the versions, I am wanting this for 1.9 for my book, but 1.10 is
so close to 1.9, I doubt that anything I come up with wouldn't apply
there for the next couple of weeks.  Now, I am really out of here, no
more from me till really late this evening, or the weekend. :-)

-- DJ Lucas


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: icedtea6-1.9-determine_jdk_type-3.patch
Url: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20100812/57a27fb2/icedtea6-1.9-determine_jdk_type-3.patch