6b18 build problems

Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu.com
Sat Feb 20 06:35:31 PST 2010


On 20.02.2010 12:19, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 19 February 2010 23:28, Matthias Klose<doko at ubuntu.com>  wrote:
>> seen some build problems with 6b18
>>
>
>  From the rest of your email it sounds like you actually mean IcedTea6
> with the recent updates, rather than upstream OpenJDK6 in most cases.

yes (how much is "most" for three cases ?-)

>>   - ant-1.8 returns an error code != 0 calling ant -diagnostics,
>>    breaking the build.
>
> Haven't seen this new version yet, but I would guess that is an
> OpenJDK or Ant issue.
>
> if this is intended, then we need a
>    workaround in openjdk.

it looks like the build now requires the replaceregexp task, which at least in 
Debian is in the ant-optional package. However the exit code of ant -diagnostics 
doesn't change with this package installed.

>>   - cacao build failure when configured with
>>      --with-openjdk=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk
>>      --with-hotspot-build=original
>>      --with-additional-vms=cacao
>>    works with a two stage build using gcj.
>>
>
> --with-cacao was broken until yesterday due to one of the patches.  I
> haven't seen this failure and it's odd if it only occurs when using
> --with-openjdk and not a full build.  Why would java.nio.ByteBuffer be
> missing?  It's even in GCJ.

the build did include these changes.

>>    details:
>>
>> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39430688/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-armel.openjdk-6_6b18~pre1-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>>
>>   - make jtregcheck starts rebuilding the whole openjdk again. apparently
>>    an out of date stamp, or a missing stamp. still searching for this one.
>>    any ideas?
>
> No, other than make sure you're using the latest HEAD as I did fix a
> few issues yesterday.

no, didn't fix. Mark (W.), is this seen on the buildd's as well, when running 
make && make check?

   Matthias



More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list