RFC: JamVM: Fix configure --enable-jamvm full bootstrap build.

[Mark Wielaard]

On Sun, February 27, 2011 20:23, Xerxes Ranby wrote:
>   On 2011-02-27 13:25, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Ok to push to IcedTea6 HEAD
>> Certainly for head.
> Great!
> Commited to:
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/rev/7f61b6fae9da
>
>>> and 1.10 ?
>> That is up to Andrew.
> "Branch pushes require an approval but there's no specially endowed
> person who has to give that approval i.e. you can do it if you
> feel comfortable doing so."
> See:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-February/012362.html
>
> Ok for 1.10 ?

I think if it is fine for trunk, then it is fine for the branch too.
It doesn't really make sense to have a non-bootstrappable jamvm on the
trunk.

BTW. If you look at the buildbot test results there is something
odd going on with the langtools tests. There are some failures that
we should take a look at. But the odd thing is that they seem to
just abort after T6397044. I can reproduce this locally.
The logs stop at T6397044, but I have a (passing) T6397286.jtr
file. Which seems to mean the actual failure/crash/abort is in
that one or in processing the results from it. I haven't debugged
it further.