fcs 147 shark preliminary patches, separated
Chris Phillips
ChrisPhi at LGonQn.Org
Fri Jul 15 06:53:29 PDT 2011
Hi,
Attached are the separate patches (minus Xerxes changes
though I can provide also if you wish).
Webrev's here:
http://lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/webrev-frame_zero.cpp-describe_pd_missing/
http://lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/webrev-sharedRuntime_zero.cpp-needs-rework-after-indy-reorg/
http://lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/webrev-sharkContext.hpp-typo-in-assert/
http://lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/webrev-methodHandles_zero.hpp-missing/
With Xerxes fixes, this is what it takes to get zero/shark to compile in
product or debug for b147/fcs. There are still significant issues in shark
and zero doesn't pass the invoke dynamic tests.
Chris
PS
Full webrev of my current build is here:
http://lgonqn.org/temp/ChrisPhi/webrev_3/
On 15/07/11 09:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 08:42 Fri 15 Jul , Chris Phillips wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Ok , I'll break it down into separate patches.
>>
> Thanks. It's just I know Xerxes ended up having to do this
> with some of Gary's mega-patches so seems better to get it right
> from the start.
>
>> Chris
>>
>> (Haven't xeen Xerxes on for a while perhaps
>> he's on holidays?)
>>
>>
>> On 15/07/11 07:27 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 01:29 Fri 15 Jul , Chris Phillips wrote:
>>>> Hi Damien,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Yes I know that Xerxes has submitted the 2
>>>> changes you point out, I stand on the shoulders of giants!
>>>> (I am an amateur in both zero and shark and a total
>>>> newby in LLVM... )
>>>>
>>> Then I'm confused as to why Xerxes hasn't committed them...
>>>
>>> I'd prefer we broke this up as much as possible to make it easier to
>>> backport relevant parts to IcedTea6.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hs-frame_zero.cpp-describe_pd_missing.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20110715/cacc85a9/hs-frame_zero.cpp-describe_pd_missing.patch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hs-sharedRuntime_zero.cpp-needs-rework-after-indy-reorg.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1845 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20110715/cacc85a9/hs-sharedRuntime_zero.cpp-needs-rework-after-indy-reorg.patch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hs-sharkContext.hpp-typo-in-assert.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 454 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20110715/cacc85a9/hs-sharkContext.hpp-typo-in-assert.patch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hs-methodHandles_zero.hpp-missing.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3435 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20110715/cacc85a9/hs-methodHandles_zero.hpp-missing.patch
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list