[RFC][icedtea-web] extend reproducers engine for signed applications

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Tue Jun 21 06:15:23 PDT 2011


Most of the basic 12 reproducers is throwiing (correct) exception  when application is not signed. But when it is signed, then they should make theirs changes.
My ideas was to make duplicatre of each jar fromsimple reproducers  and sign (self signed - is that enough?) this copy (eg change name of jar to "sameAsOriginal-signed.jar" although to reuse jnlp files bounded to this jar so they will be named eg sameAsBefore-signed.jnlp and point to signed jar. Just testcases will ne necessary to write for signed applications again.
Or to crate directory beside "simple" called "signed" where will be sources, resources and testcases for autoamticly compiled and signed applets. I would prefere second option, althoug it will leed to small duplicate code, it seems clearer to me.

What do you thing about this? Is there need to include automated-signed reproducers?

Regards J.

More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list