RFC: JamVM: there is something odd going on with the langtools tests

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Thu Mar 3 08:34:28 PST 2011

On 03/03/2011 03:26 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 16:00 Thu 03 Mar     , Xerxes Rånby wrote:
>> On 2011-03-03 15:20, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 14:21 Thu 03 Mar     , Xerxes Rånby wrote:
>>>> My brain are wired something like this:
>>>> Code can be reviewed either before it is committed or after. We expect major changes to be reviewed before being committed, but smaller changes can be reviewed after commit. The developer responsible for a code change is also responsible for making all necessary review-related changes.
>>>> I still request for comments but I felt the change to be small enough to be first committed and then reviewed after.
>>> Is that a quote from somewhere?
>> This are quoted from Code Review point 3. of the LLVM Developer Policy,
>> http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html
> You mean the project that changes its API all the time? ;-)

LOL!  Yeah, that one...  :)


More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list