[icedtea-web] RFC: add unit tests for the jnlp parser
Omair Majid
omajid at redhat.com
Thu Mar 31 07:00:01 PDT 2011
On 03/30/2011 08:21 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 20:08 Wed 30 Mar , Omair Majid wrote:
>
> snip...
>
>>>>>
>>> There does need to be something in there such as:
>>>
>>> // Based on code from X (C) Y
>>>
>>
>> Sure, except I dont know the copyright owners. So I have left it as:
>> // Based on code from JUnit
>>
>
> They don't have license headers?
>
No, they don't. For example, take a look at
https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/src/main/java/org/junit/runner/JUnitCore.java.
I had to look at other programs to find the CPL header.
>>
>> I think it's a build-time dependency, not a run-time dependency. But you
>> are correct - the tree is quite big.
>>
>
> Same difference on Gentoo. Everything is built from source.
>
Yes, but for distributions that supply pre-built packages, the
dependencies are much smaller. On Fedora, for example, it's just 3
packages - TestNG, QDox, and BeanShell.
>>
>> Updated patch attached. Any thoughts or comments?
>>
>
> Looks fine. If it passes make distcheck, it can go in.
>
It does. Thanks for reviewing it. I will be pushing it shortly.
> It does need documenting in README, but I'm happy for that to be a separate patch.
>
Thanks; the patch was getting quite big.
Thanks again for all your comments and suggestions.
Cheers,
Omair
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list