[icedtea-web] RFC: Patch to fix applet exit

Deepak Bhole dbhole at redhat.com
Mon May 2 11:27:12 PDT 2011


* Omair Majid <omajid at redhat.com> [2011-05-02 14:19]:
> On 05/02/2011 02:16 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Omair Majid<omajid at redhat.com>  [2011-05-02 13:21]:
> >>On 05/02/2011 11:56 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>This patch addresses an issue cause by the tg.stop() call in
> >>>PluginAppletViewer.appletClose().
> >>>
> >>>With the recent classloader sharing changes, applets from the same page
> >>>have the same threadgroup. As a result if 2 copies are opened and one is
> >>>closed, the other one stops too.
> >>>
> >>>With this patch, tg.stop() is no longer called and instead, the plugin
> >>>will halt the VM after the last applet to guarantee that resources are
> >>>freed eventually (the tg.stop was added because not all applets exit
> >>>nicely on stop/dispose).
> >>>
> >>
> >>It would be nice if this was improved so that threadgroups could be
> >>terminated when all applets belonging to the threadgroup have
> >>stopped.
> >>
> >
> >Yep, I completely agree. However that is not possible about some
> >redesign, which I would like to avoid for 1.1 as it is already branched.
> >
> 
> Sure. I am fine with the patch as a quick fix. I was just pointing
> out that we should aim for a better fix later.
> 

Cool. Thanks for reviewing!

Cheers,
Deepak

> >
> >>>ChangeLog:
> >>>2011-05-02  Deepak Bhole<dbhole at redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>>     * plugin/icedteanp/java/sun/applet/PluginAppletViewer.java
> >>>     (appletClose): Do not try to stop threads, now that the loader is shared
> >>>     and the thread group for applets on a page is identical. Call dispose from
> >>>     invokeAndWait.
> >>>     (appletSystemExit): Exit the VM when called.
> >>>
> >>>Okay for HEAD and 1.1?
> >>>
> >>
> >>The patch looks fine to me. I believe the appcontext/threadgroup
> >>changes were committed only to head. Is this patch needed for 1.1?
> >>
> 
> Looks like you missed this part of the email. Is this patch needed for 1.1?
> 
> Thanks,
> Omair



More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list