Release and Commit Policies

[Jiri Vanek]

>>
>> This in contradiction with previous sentence. When reviewer said It
>> looks ok then possible it can not be stopped by someone else
>> (afterwards? Or overlap someone else "against" hints?) ?
>>
>
> That's possible.  This section probably needs to be expanded to:
>
> "The review process should continue until the majority of reviewers
> are happy with the patch.  Where there is divided opinion, the input
> of other developers should be sought in order to allow the discussion
> to reach an appropriate conclusion.  The review process may involve
> several revisions of the patch being posted, in order to rectify any
> perceived shortcomings.  Unless otherwise stated by the reviewer, it
> should be assumed that the new version of the patch should be posted
> and an acknowledgement acquired before the patch is committed."
>
> Does that help?
>
>>

Its getting closer to study of law instead of information technologies :)
But yes. Its better. But maybe  still worthy of future discussion.

Thanx for it.

J.