/hg/icedtea6: PR689: Shark fails to find LLVM 2.9 System headers...

[Omair Majid]

On 05/30/2011 03:04 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 14:17 Tue 12 Apr     , xranby at icedtea.classpath.org wrote:
>> changeset 307d19e0cca0 in /hg/icedtea6
>> details: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6?cmd=changeset;node=307d19e0cca0
>> author: Xerxes R?nby<xerxes at zafena.se>
>> date: Tue Apr 12 15:56:56 2011 +0200
>>
>> 	PR689: Shark fails to find LLVM 2.9 System headers during build
>>
>> 	2011-04-12 Xerxes R?nby<xerxes at zafena.se>
>>
>> 	PR689: Shark fails to find LLVM 2.9 System headers during
>> 	build
>> 		* Makefile.am: Add patch.
>> 		* patches/shark-llvm-2.9.patch: In LLVM 2.9 System headers are
>> 	moved to Support.
>> 		* NEWS: Updated.
>>
>>
>> diffstat:
>>
>>   ChangeLog                    |   8 ++++++++
>>   Makefile.am                  |   3 ++-
>>   NEWS                         |   2 ++
>>   patches/shark-llvm-2.9.patch |  28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I just had to move this to the hs20 section as it wouldn't apply with hs19
> and caused a build failure:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/icedtea-test/2011-May/000369.html
>
> Did you test this with both HotSpot builds?  Will the release branches
> be affected in the same way?

Erm. I think this might have been my mistake. I replaced Xerxes's patch 
with the hg export of an upstream changeset (only on HEAD though). The 
only difference between the patch and the hg export was a copyright 
change in the year. That might have broken this. Sorry.

Omair