[icedtea-web] RFC: Patch to fix PR778

[Danesh Dadachanji]

Hi,

[snip]

>
> Ok for head and 1.1?

It fails to patch in 1.1 because the changeset that implemented the 
synchronization of this class was never backported:

http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea-web/rev/0398f63d1b21

Would it be better to backport or to remove the synchronized clauses 
from the patch? From reading the email Denis sent out[1], it looks like 
backporting was just never brought up. Perhaps that should be revisited?

[1] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-June/014686.html

Regards,
Danesh

>
> Cheers,
> Deepak