[rfc] [icedtea-web] blacklist for reproducers

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 06:51:20 PDT 2012


missing patch. Sorry.
On 04/06/2012 02:56 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is second from total of 5 patches which are introducing Tets For Applets[1]
>
> Thus particular one is introducing blacklist. The test-engine is delivered to class-path together
> with all reproducers' testcases. If the file form engine is interface, have no @Test methods or does
> not meet constructor requirements, then the file fails, and this is making our statistics misleading.
> Also I'm expecting growing of engine (now I'm planing @bug and @browser annotations and some more
> logic around. See content of ignore-list after all this changes[2]. Also I would like to refactor
> ServerAccess class little bit in long term (as it have grown littlebit and have to much inner
> classes right now) future...
>
> Probably cleaner solution will be to separate testengine from testaces more then it is now, but I
> have tried this refactoring and I was getting deeper and deeper and it was bringing more and more
> issues. From this I'm really for blacklist rather then for refactoring.
> Also one more benefit is here - you can easili blacklist all reproducers except one or two fro make ;)
>
> Best regards J.
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2012-March/017799.html
> [2]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20120320/8ef6bdfe/browserTests-blacklist-0001.diff
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reproducersBlackist.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1519 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20120406/29ce1f3c/reproducersBlackist.diff 


More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list