RFC - Reduce loading of PropertiesFile

[Thomas Meyer]

Zitat von Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com>:

> On 04/19/2012 09:14 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>
>>
>> patch1.diff
>>
>>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Thomas Meyer<thomas at m3y3r.de>
>> # Date 1334859522 -7200
>> # Node ID e750944c8d66bbab0801e7490303eef26b689df3
>> # Parent  4a35862de3fc26a9e1cdfb66fd7b6c750f18371b
>> Enable JNLPRuntime class to run in headless mode
>>
>> diff -r 4a35862de3fc -r e750944c8d66  
>> netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/runtime/JNLPRuntime.java
>> --- a/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/runtime/JNLPRuntime.java	Thu Apr 19  
>> 20:02:40 2012 +0200
>> +++ b/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/runtime/JNLPRuntime.java	Thu Apr 19  
>> 20:18:42 2012 +0200
>> @@ -199,12 +199,14 @@
>>          ServiceManager.setServiceManagerStub(new  
>> XServiceManagerStub()); // ignored if we're running under Web Start
>>
>>          policy = new JNLPPolicy();
>> -        security = new JNLPSecurityManager(); // side effect:  
>> create JWindow
>> -
>> -        try {
>> -             
>> UIManager.setLookAndFeel(UIManager.getSystemLookAndFeelClassName());
>> -        } catch (Exception e) {
>> -            // ignore it
>> +        if (!headless) {
>> +            security = new JNLPSecurityManager(); // side effect:  
>> create JWindow
>> +
>> +            try {
>> +                 
>> UIManager.setLookAndFeel(UIManager.getSystemLookAndFeelClassName());
>> +            } catch (Exception e) {
>> +                // ignore it
>> +            }
>>          }
>>
>>          doMainAppContextHacks();
>>
>>
> hmhm. This looks un-relevant to original issue. What is motivation?  
> Can you poist it in new patch?

without this path the unit test fails in/after a call to  
JNLPRuntime.initialize() with a StackOverflowException.

my solution was to disable the SecurityManager for headless mode. this  
made my unit test work.
I'm not sure if this is the correct thing to do here! Help appriciated!

thomas