Fwd: Re: [rfc][icedtea-web] reproducer for PR905

[Jiri Vanek]

late reply....  Was waiting for @KnownToFail and then forgotten a bit. Updated to latest state:
		
2012-04-18  Jiri Vanek  <jvanek at redhat.com>

	Added tests for PR905 - parameters in jnlp/html application/applet resources
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl.html:
	html file to launch applet, requested archive jar have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl1.jnlp:
	jnlp file to launch application, requested archive jar have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl2.jnlp:
	jnlp file to launch application, requested jnlp have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned.html:
	html file to launch signed applet, requested archive jar have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned1.jnlp:
	jnlp file to launch signed application, requested archive jar have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned2.jnlp:
	jnlp file to launch signed application, requested jnlp have parameter
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrl2.jnlp
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrl.jnlp
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrlSigned2.jnlp
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrlSigned.jnlp
	variations launching applets from jnlp
	* tests/reproducers/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/testcases/ParametrizedJarUrlTests.java:
	testaceses of above ParametrizedJarUrl/jnlps+htmls namely - (parametrizedAppletTestSignedTest)
	, (testParametrizedJarUrl2), (testParametrizedJarUrlSigned2): passing
	calls /partially/ with parameter. Those test are passing.
	(parametrizedAppletTestSignedFirefoxTest) call with parameter upon signed
	applet in browser, failing and so is representing PR905



On 05/03/2012 04:51 PM, Danesh Dadachanji wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Thanks for the updates! There are a few typos, commented below.
>
> Did you want to push this into HEAD _before_ the fix for PR905 is there? I'm worried that we're
> increasing the number of failing tests. On the other hand though, I don't want this to slip through
> the cracks! What do you think? I was hoping to get PR905's fix done with this and have the
> changesets pushed simultaneously but I've been too busy to take care of it. :(
>
> On 18/04/12 10:12 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> On 04/04/2012 04:42 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This reproducer is representing pr905 behaviour. All the tests except
>>>>> signed jar with parametrised archive are passing, which is correct, and
>>>>> the failing test is representing the issue.
>>>>>
>> ......snip
>>    All issues mentioned here should be fixed in new patch
>> Especially fixed vendor/homepage of tests, unified ?test=..., and using of already pushed signed
>> applet test
>> ......snip
>
> Thanks!
>
> [snip]
>
>> changelog:
>>
>> 2012-04-18  Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com>
>>
>>      Added tests for PR905 - parameters in jnlp/html application/applet resources
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/AppletTest/testcases/AppletTestTests.java:
>>      fixed reference to PROCESS_TIMEOUT by class instead by reference
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl.html:
>>      html file to launch applet, requested archive jar have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl1.jnlp:
>>      jnlp file to launch application, requested archive jar have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrl2.jnlp:
>>      jnlp file to launch application, requested jnlp have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned.html:
>>      html file to launch signed applet, requested archive jar have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned1.jnlp:
>>      jnlp file to launch signed application, requested archive jar have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarUrlSigned2.jnlp:
>>      jnlp file to launch signed application, requested jnlp have parameter
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrl2.jnlp
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrl.jnlp
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrlSigned2.jnlp
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/resources/ParametrizedJarAppletUrlSigned.jnlp
>>      variations launching applets from jnlp
>>      * tests/jnlp_tests/simple/ParametrizedJarUrl/testcases/ParametrizedJarUrlTests.java:
>>      testaceses of above ParametrizedJarUrl/jnlps+htmls namely - (parametrizedAppletTestSignedTest)
>
> s/testaceses/testcases/
>
>>      , (testParametrizedJarUrl2), (testParametrizedJarUrlSigned2): passing
>>      calls /partially/ with parameter. Those test are passing.
>>      (parametrizedAppletTestSignedFirefoxTest) call with parameter upon signed
>>      applet in browser, failing and so is representing PR905
>>
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>> +        String s3 = "applet was initialised";
>> +        Assert.assertTrue("AppletTest stdout should contains " + s3 + " bud didn't",
>> pr.stdout.contains(s3));
>
> s/should contains/should contain/
> s/bud didn't/but didn't/
>
> This is basically all over the place again!
>
> How do these keep slipping back in? :/ Which test case are you using as a template to generate the
> rest? We should fix that one up in HEAD.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pr905reproducer4.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 36929 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20120808/f23ee104/pr905reproducer4.diff