[rfc][icedtea-web] reproducer for pr822 (I hope)

[Pavel Tisnovsky]

Hi Jiri,

I think that your reproducer is correct, but please try to fix following minor things:

%s/Cought/Caught/g       :-)
%s/exapmle/example/g
%s/dicutabile/questionable/g


String sss="Applet killing himself after 2000 ms of life";

The value "2000" is based on the actual value of a Killer's public
attribute named "n". It would be IMHO more clear to rename
this attribute to TIMEOUT and make it probably final. Also the
string above should read:

String sss="Applet killing himself after " + Killer.TIMEOUT + " ms of life";
(similar string is used three times in the code).


With these fixes it's ok to push this reproducer to HEAD.

Thank you in advance,
Pavel T.



----- Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com> wrote:
> ping?
> 
> 
> 
> updated for latest states:
> 
> 2012-05-30  Jiri Vanek  <jvanek at redhat.com>
> 
> 	Added reproducer fro multiple signatures (and PR822)
> 	* Makefile.am: SIGNED_REPRODUCERS growth for signed2 directory
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/*: test for launching
> 	application containing two signed - each by different certificate - jars
> 	and different signatures are applied on different packages
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest.html:
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest1.jnlp:
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest1_requesting.jnlp
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest2.jnlp:
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/srcs/somecrazytestpackage/MultipleSignaturesTest.java:
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTest/testcases/MultipleSignaturesTestTests.java:
> 	* tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/*: test for launching
> 	application containing two signed - each by different certificate - jars
> 	but different signatures are applied on same packages
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest1_SamePackage.jnlp:
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest1_SamePackage_requesting.jnlp
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest2_SamePackage.jnlp:
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/resources/MultipleSignaturesTest_SamePackage.html:
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/srcs/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage.java:
> 	* 
> tests/reproducers/signed2/MultipleSignaturesTestSamePackage/testcases/MultipleSignaturesTestTestsSamePackage.java:
> 	* tests/test-extensions/net/sourceforge/jnlp/ServerAccess.java:
> 	introduced VERBOSE_OPTION with "-verbose" value
> 
> 
> On 05/30/2012 06:20 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This reproducer is trying to lunch application/applet consisted from two jars, each signed by
> > different signature.
> >
> > Applets are behaving correctly - are launched when packages are signed differently.
> > jnlp application donot:
> > a) when
> >    <security>
> >      <all-permissions/>
> >    </security>
> > is included in jnlp, then it dies with "jars are not signed exception"
> > b) when the
> >    <security>
> >      <all-permissions/>
> >    </security>
> > is missing then restricted code is allowed (in case of same package it dies correctly with
> > "different signatures for package" exception.
> >
> > I consider both a and b as incorrect, but we can live with b until a is fixed.
> >
> > So the last test method of both testcases should be @KnownToFail :)
> >
> > btw I'm not sure if this is representing pr822 but i guess it is.
> >
> > 8 new tests - two of them failing.
> >
> > Thanx in advice
> >   J.
> >
> >
>