[RFC][icedtea-web] Plugin doesn't halt when required elements from JNLP files are missing.
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Mar 12 04:26:28 PDT 2012
On 03/12/2012 12:22 PM, Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> On 03/12/2012 11:50 AM, Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>> Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/2012 09:32 PM, Danesh Dadachanji wrote:
>>>>> On 11/01/12 02:18 PM, Danesh Dadachanji wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/01/12 11:31 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/06/2012 08:08 PM, Danesh Dadachanji wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/01/12 12:37 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 01/06/2012 05:44 PM, Danesh Dadachanji wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the plugin docs[1],<title> and<vendor> are required
>> snip
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/Parser.java
>>>>> b/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/Parser.java
>>>>> --- a/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/Parser.java
>>>>> +++ b/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/Parser.java
>>>>> @@ -504,6 +504,11 @@ class Parser {
>>>>> child = child.getNextSibling();
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (info.getTitle() == null || info.getTitle().equals(""))
>>>>> + throw new ParseException(R("PNoTitleElement"));
>>>>> + if (info.getVendor() == null || info.getVendor().equals(""))
>>>>> + throw new ParseException(R("PNoVendorElement"));
>>>>> +
>>>>> return info;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>> I would suggest "".equals(info.get*().trim()) instead of
>>>> info.get*().equals("")
>>>> Usage of trim i straight forward and I think it is necessary.
>>>> The "".equals instead of string.equals("") really just minor nitpick
>>>> :) "".equals(null) returns false instead of NUllPointerException. I do
>>>> not believe trim() will ever return null, but it is good habit (IMHO
>>>> O:) )
>>>> If no need for trim will be here, then just "".equals(info.get*()) will
>>>> be enough instead of both conditions.
>>>
>>> String.trim() does not return null so you don't need to worry
>> Yy - as I have already said ;) but STILL it is good habit O:)
>>>
>>> Then you could use predicate isEmpty() which is IMHO more readable
>>> than equals("") (since 1.6)
>> isEmpty do not trim :((( => info.get*() == null ||
>> info.get*().trim().isEmpty() ... :D (if we can live with method which
>> appeared in 1.6)
> Yeah I mean info.get*().trim().isEmpty()
> (btw I think we could end with this basic stuff ;-)
>>
>> But this leads me to question - which javaSE version is icedtea-web
>> comaptible with and which _should_ be compatible with?
>
> I assume it should be compatible with 1.6 and 1.7
Yap, I guess the same... Poor mainframes with ibm 1.4.2 are out of luck again ;)
> (and I'm pretty sure that
> the code already contains some 1.6-related code ;-) which could be easy
Although i do not KNOW about it I BELIEVE to it too !-) ..and I think there is no need to keep older javas supported anyway...
> to check using --source and --target)
Ah Yah!
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/resources/Messages.properties
>> snip
>>
>> J.
>
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list