[icedtea-web] RFC: Patch to fix PR895

[Omair Majid]

On 03/13/2012 09:59 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> Ah, yeah I thought of checking for time too but I was hoping to avoid it
> as it is not reliable. In any case, given that neither of us have a
> better way in mind, I guess this is better than nothing :)
>

Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. If we find a cleaner way to do
this check later on, we can always change things.

>> As a side note, we should really try and reduce the inter-dependencies
>> (between the classloader, jnlpfile and downloading), but this works for now.
>>
> 
> Yeah :/ there have been other cases where this has been a hindrance to
> writing tests too.

I will poke at this some more when I have some spare time.

> Are you OK with the content of the patch?

Yeah, I think it's fine for 1.1 and 1.2. It looks like you agree that we
should wait a bit for HEAD, and that sounds fine to me too.

Cheers,
Omair