8002344 code review request: (was Re: [PATCH] for bug 2376501: Krb5LoginModule config class does not return proper KDC list from DNS)

[Weijun Wang]

Ah, it's the incident report number. They were automatically converted 
to an internal Oracle bug before we started using JIRA a month ago. I 
don't know where do they go now.

Anyway, let's use 8002344 now.

-Max

On 11/13/2012 07:15 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 19:00 +0800, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Where did you create this bug? Every new OpenJDK bug should starts with
>> 7 or 8. I've been wondering what 2376501 means and thought it's
>> something RedHat internal.
>
> :) All I know is that it's nothing internal to Red Hat and I've created
> it via bugs.sun.com and clicking on "submit new bug"[1]. The bug ID came
> from the email I've received after it was submitted. Anywho, just wanted
> to let you know that there's another bug open *somewhere* within Oracle
> for the same issue and I can't access it.
>
> Cheers,
> Severin
>
> [1] Forwarded this bug email to you privately.
>
>> On 11/13/2012 06:43 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi Max,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 08:38 +0800, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi Severin
>>>>
>>>> I've created an OpenJDK bug and created a new webrev:
>>>>
>>>>       http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8002344/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> The Config.java change is identical to yours, and I added a small tweak
>>>> in KrbServiceLocator, and a quite ugly regression test.
>>>
>>> Cool. Thanks! FWIW, I've created a bug with ID 2376501 for this (even
>>> before I submitted a patch). Unfortunately, this bug is not accessible
>>> to me. All it let me do was creating it :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Severin
>>>
>
>
>