[rfc][icedtea-web] Fix for PR1198, JSObject passed incorrectly to Javascript

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 07:09:14 PST 2013


On 01/04/2013 08:36 PM, Adam Domurad wrote:
>
>           streamhandler.postCallRequest(request);
>           streamhandler.write(request.getMessage());
> diff --git a/tests/reproducers/simple/JSObjectFromEval/testcases/JSObjectFromEvalTest.java b/tests/reproducers/simple/JSObjectFromEval/testcases/JSObjectFromEvalTest.java
> --- a/tests/reproducers/simple/JSObjectFromEval/testcases/JSObjectFromEvalTest.java
> +++ b/tests/reproducers/simple/JSObjectFromEval/testcases/JSObjectFromEvalTest.java
> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ exception statement from your version.
>
>   import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
>
> -import net.sourceforge.jnlp.annotations.KnownToFail;
> -
>   import net.sourceforge.jnlp.ProcessResult;
>   import net.sourceforge.jnlp.ServerAccess.AutoClose;
>   import net.sourceforge.jnlp.annotations.Bug;
> @@ -62,7 +60,6 @@ public class JSObjectFromEvalTest extend
>       @Test
>       @TestInBrowsers(testIn = { Browsers.all })
>       @NeedsDisplay
> -    @KnownToFail
>       @Bug(id = { "PR1198" })
>       public void testJSObjectSetMemberIsSet() throws Exception {
>           ProcessResult pr = server.executeBrowser("/JSObjectFromEval.html",

One forgotten  question to above chunk:

You told that there was one important change in tests - well I have noted this one, it does not look 
so dramatic:) Was there something else??

J.



More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list