[icedtea-web] "Not All Signed" dialog and low-security setting

Andrew Azores aazores at redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 08:25:49 PST 2014


On 01/20/2014 11:17 AM, Andrew Azores wrote:
> On 12/23/2013 10:28 AM, Andrew Azores wrote:
>> (snip)
>>
>> Again, using zimbra web interface today, so formatting might be weird.
>>
>> I have worked on this some more and added in the signer information 
>> etc. into the dialog, and also done a little bit of extra minor 
>> refactoring (changing type names). The subclassing is also done 
>> better now (I think) and has tests. Unfortunately it got very messy 
>> when I was working on all of this and splitting up the work, so I 
>> only have the end product all together as one monolithic patch :( 
>> however I do have some older versions that are split into pieces. So 
>> the attached patch file is the full thing, and the attached tgz 
>> contains the somewhat-out-of-date smaller pieces. I can't really 
>> split the full patch into smaller pieces very well because some of 
>> the different steps required working on the same files and even the 
>> same parts of the same files.
>>
>> So here we have the UnsignedApplet dialog being made abstract and 
>> having its name changed, and a subclass being introduced that takes 
>> its original name and brings back identical functionality. Then we 
>> have a new subclass introduced which is the PartiallySigned dialog, 
>> and methods and enum constants are added to facilitate the use of 
>> this. There is also a unit test that tests both of these subclasses 
>> and verifies that their implementations of the parent's abstract 
>> methods make sense.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrew A
>
> Update! I rebased this patch on latest head and fixed an issue where 
> the new PartiallySigned dialog would appear along with the old "fully 
> signed" dialog. I also split the patch up into some smaller units for 
> ease of review, however they do all need to be applied at once for the 
> result to actually be buildable.
>
> Thanks,
>

Ping?

Thanks,

-- 
Andrew A



More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list