Icedtea supports something called "Pepper"?

[Jiri Vanek]

On 07/15/2014 08:18 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Nope. ITW is continuing to run unsigned applets. It jsut warning you more.
>
> No, it does not automatically load applets. You´ve got to click to run.


Yes. And thats wrong?
Also - if they understand, they can allow all unsigned appelts to norbeing asked, or remember theirs 
decisions.

> Hence "Will all my applets fail to work next year? (as they are doing
> with latest
> Oracle releases)"

no. W are nto going to allow this.
>
> Most people, when faced with non-loading applets, think they "don´t

I must be missing something. "non-laoding" applets ? The appelts do load (??).

> work". You are assuming that people actually follow, read and
> understand security dialogs.

Uff... I must admit my user experience study is not as rich as it should be. May you be more 
specific what you think is an flaw? And ifit really is, what is and cure for it?


Thank you in advance,
   J.