[rfc][icedtea-web] dont expect junit have hamcrest included

[Jiri Vanek]

On 01/30/2015 10:12 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> * Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com> [2015-01-29 04:59]:
>> Still, if we drop the "transitive hamcrest" then the best solution should be applied:
>> If junit is found:
>>   - check if junit contains hamcrest
>>     - should be simple cllass compiling with importing some hamcrest class
>>     - if does, no hamcrest search
>>     - if does not, check for hamcrest
>>       - if no hamcrest avaiable halt configure
>
> This does seem like the right approach.
>
>> Or use your curent approach
>>    - always check for hamcrest, but continue if it do not exists.
>>    - disadvantage is that missing hamcrest is quite hard to find from gotten exception
>
> How about I push my current patch, and then someone (possibly me) can
> step in and further improve things to work as you suggested? We now know
> this patch fixes tests on at least two systems.

Sure. go on!

J.