[rfc][icedtea-web] fixing locales reproducers
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Mar 9 13:56:10 UTC 2015
On 03/09/2015 02:52 PM, Jie Kang wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 03/09/2015 02:33 PM, Jie Kang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> This minor line minifix fixes 11 reproducers.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> From what I see, the key should be:
>>>
>>> BOHelp1
>>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> BOHelp
>>>
>>> Removing it means that this key is no longer checked in the test to exist
>>> in all properties files, which may make the test pass, but may not be the
>>> best path. I think the purpose of this test should be to check the keys
>>> that all the properties files 'must' have to run IT-W properly.
>>>
>>> If you think that it's okay for the key to not be tested to exist in all
>>> properties files, sure, you can push it. Otherwise changing it to BOHelp1
>>> should also make it pass as this is in every property file we have now.
>>> There was a patch (IcedTea-Web settings made to use OptionParser) that
>>> renamed BOHelp -> BOHelp1, and added BOHelp2 to the english properties
>>> files.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The keys were moreover randomly selected during creation of the test.
>
> I see.
>
>>
>> Fact that the bohelp1 is currently only in main properties, makes it
>> necessary to be removed.
>
> ? From what I see BOHelp1 is in all of the properties files... just BOHelp2 is not.
>
Ok. My wrong.
> If you remove BOHelp1 from properties files, does the part of IT-W that uses it still run without crashing? If it doesn't run, I think you should still include BOHelp1 in the
If the tests passes with bohelp1, I will include it instead of deleting. If not, I will rmeove it.
Are you ok with it?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>>
>> It will not be missed :)
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> J.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list