Icetea exception

[Jiri Vanek]

On 06/27/2016 05:49 PM, Jacob Wisor wrote:
Hi Jacob!

Where have you get this file?

>
> Bingo! Like I have assumed. The OBJECT element in the HTML document has been authored incorrectly.
> Look here:
>
>>                         <object
>>                             classid = "clsid:CAFEEFAC-0015-0000-0012-ABCDEFFEDCBA"
>>                             codebase =
>> "http://java.sun.com/update/1.5.0/jinstall-1_5_0_12-windows-i586.cab#Version=5,0,120,4"
>>                             WIDTH = "640" HEIGHT = "480" NAME = "ucx" >
>>                             <PARAM NAME = CODE VALUE = "ultracam.class" >
>
> First, "class" is a reserved keyword in the Java programming language and therefore must not be a
> package name. Second, the ultracam class has not been specified with its fully qualified name. The
> VALUE attribute of the PARAM element must state the fully qualified name of the applet's main class.

The ultracam class may stand in default package.
>
>>                             <PARAM NAME = ARCHIVE VALUE = "ultracam.jar" >
>>                             <PARAM NAME = NAME VALUE = "ucx" >
>>                             <param name = "type" value =
>> "application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.5.0_12">
>>                             <param name = "scriptable" value = "false">
>>                             <PARAM NAME = "accountcode" VALUE="YWRtaW46emd1cmFUTnc=" />
>>                             <PARAM NAME = "codebase" VALUE="http://10.1.1.1:80/admin" />
>>                             <PARAM NAME = "mode" VALUE="0" />
>>
>>                             <comment>
>>                             <embed
>>                                     type = "application/x-java-applet" \
>>                                     CODE = "ultracam.class" \
>
> Essentially, the same applies here too.
>
>>                                     ARCHIVE = "ultracam.jar" \
>>                                     NAME = "ucx" \
>>                                     WIDTH = "640" \
>>                                     HEIGHT = "480" \
>>                                     accountcode ="YWRtaW46emd1cmFUTnc=" / \
>>                                     codebase ="http://10.1.1.1:80/admin" / \
>>                                     mode ="0" / \
>>                                 scriptable = false
>>                                 pluginspage =
>> "http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/index.html#download">
>>                                 <noembed>
>>
>>                                     </noembed>
>>                             </embed>
>>                             </comment>
>>                         </object>
>
> So, what can you do now? a) You should report this bug do the camera vendor and wait for a firmware

Its hardly to happen:(
> update. b) In the meantime, you can download the ultracam.jar JAR file, find the fully qualified
> name of the ultracam class, put it into the HTML document and launch it from your local computer.

I doubt it will work like this. The jar should run on device where it is doing the job for the ITW user.

But to follow this advice - you can check the communication between the cam and browser/javaws 
--html  and remove .class on the fly

> There is nothing IcedTea-Web developers can do here.
>

Actually - this is reported as regression. I guess 1.5 was previous ITW on his box. Why it was working?
So maybe add stripping of .class is the bugfx to go?


Jacob - thank you very much for investigations. *really* thanx!

J.