prerelase of icedtea-web 1.8
Lars Herschke
lhersch at dssgmbh.de
Thu Mar 7 14:26:03 UTC 2019
>> Not always, I just recall problems with this in case of cygpath. Do you mind to try it without?
>> If you do mind, I will push like it is. But would rather avoid double slash in jre_home\\bin\java
I can not confirm or imitate that.
The following little test program:
fn main()
{
let mut p1 = std::path::PathBuf::from(r"C:\Program Files");
p1.push("");
println!("{}", p1.display());
let mut p2 = std::path::PathBuf::from(r"C:\Program Files\");
p2.push("");
println!("{}", p2.display());
}
gives out:
p1: C:\Program Files\
p2: C:\Program Files\
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Lars Herschke
Data-Service GmbH
Beethovenstraße 2a
23617 Stockelsdorf
Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
Jiri Vanek schrieb:
> On 3/7/19 2:59 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>> So i set, the final directory separator, automatically as a slash or
>> backslash, matching the operating system. If one is already present,
>> that is harmless.
>
> Not always, I just recall problems with this in case of cygpath. Do you mind to try it without?
> If you do mind, I will push like it is. But would rather avoid double slash in jre_home\\bin\java
>
> Imho every path.push(x) is actually doing \x or /x.
>
>
> J.
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>
>> Lars Herschke
>>
>> Data-Service GmbH
>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>
>>
>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>> Thanx!
>>>
>>> Why the:
>>> + jre_dir.push("");
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> I cant see wher eit iterates over 11, 1.8 and so on, but I trust it does :)
>>>
>>> Except the empty push, Althouh it is hard to read itm I'm ok with the patch, and will push it for
>>> you (once the mepty push is justified/removed)
>>> On 3/7/19 2:37 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>> forgot patch
>>>>
>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>
>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>
>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lars Herschke schrieb:
>>>>> So, here is the new patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch tries to get JavaHome out of the registry with the following
>>>>> priosrization.
>>>>>
>>>>> - JRE 1.8
>>>>> - JDK 1.8
>>>>> - max JDK >= 9
>>>>> - JDK 1.8
>>>>> - max JDK >= 9
>>>>> - max JRE >= 9 (only 9 or 10 possible)
>>>>> - max JDK < 1.8
>>>>> - max JRE < 1.8
>>>>>
>>>>> The highest minor version within the major version is always preferred.
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition, the method find_jre checks with this patch whether it makes
>>>>> sense to append the jre directory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>
>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>
>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lars Herschke schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi Jiri.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - in addition I was unable to verify against jdk8. The ojdkbuild of jdk8 never put anything into
>>>>>>>> "my" registry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be selected and deselected in the installer. That's why I'm
>>>>>> testing JAVA_HOME and PATH so hard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am currently testing a new version of my patch. I hope to be able to
>>>>>> make it available today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>> Hi Again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Attached is the workig version of my patch from yesterday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I realised that my approach requires: java_registry_path("SOFTWARE\\JavaSoft\\JDK\\11.0.2")
>>>>>>> - note the security number. This it is no go.
>>>>>>> - in addition I was unable to verify against jdk8. The ojdkbuild of jdk8 never put anything into
>>>>>>> "my" registry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From what I seen, your patch is ok with jdk11,12 and onwards untill the registry changes again, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/6/19 6:47 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What are the regQuery and RegEnumKeyExW for?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> RegQueryInfoKeyW gives me the number of subkeys, so I can get directly
>>>>>>>> the last subkey with RegEnumKeyExW.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do tt see versions in the query.. What is the pooled order? SHould be
>>>>>>>>> jre8->jdk8->jdk11->jdkAnythingElse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I try to get Java in the following order.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - latest pre JMPS-JRE
>>>>>>>> - latest pre JMPS-JDK
>>>>>>>> - latest JMPS-JDK
>>>>>>>> - latest JMPS-JRE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I always try to get the latest Java, favoring the pre JPMS Java.
>>>>>>>> However, so I may prefer a Java 7 to a Java 11.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you mind to comapre with mine patch? (and honestly say that it is garbage and yours is more
>>>>>>>>>> bulletproof - I do not expect more)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I dont't understand on your patch, how jdkX_registry_path,
>>>>>>>> jreX_registry_path and jdk11plus_registry_path should work. There is no
>>>>>>>> JavaHome-key on these levels.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I disagree with Your change to JAVA_HOME and PATH - because it can already be jre. On contrary, if
>>>>>>>>>> it si jdk, then it is already valid. HAve that part bitten you somewhere?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are right, but on Windows, JAVA_HOME is only set by ojdkbuild and
>>>>>>>> this set JAVA_HOME to his jdk root-directory. Oracle-Java don't set
>>>>>>>> JAVA_HOME, but writes registry keys ever.
>>>>>>>> The PATH is set from ojdkbuild to [jdk-root]\bin, so my changes also
>>>>>>>> works. The PATH from Oracle-Java is complete outside the java directory
>>>>>>>> (C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Oracle\Java\javapath). In this path
>>>>>>>> you will not find any library.
>>>>>>>> Everything said so far, only applies to Java 8. As of Java 9, there is
>>>>>>>> no more jre directory around jdk.
>>>>>>>> In the end, you can not know if PATH or JAVA_HOME is a jdk or a jre,
>>>>>>>> without checking it.
>>>>>>>> It did not bother me, I just tried to be more compatible with the
>>>>>>>> standard installations under windows
>>>>>>>> Last but not least, the method is called find_jre.:-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/6/19 5:16 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> attached a new separate windows registry patch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wou. Interesting approach. As you had not replied if you will elaborate on it, I had in meantime
>>>>>>>>> did simialr patch (attached, not tested, literally just finished writing right now, and started to
>>>>>>>>> warm up windows VM) - absed on yours, jsut with the pooling of registry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My patch looks a bit more rustlike - especailly it uses chain of match instead of loop, and TBH I
>>>>>>>>> do not understand half of yours :)
>>>>>>>>> What are the regQuery and RegEnumKeyExW for?
>>>>>>>>> I do tt see versions in the query.. What is the pooled order? SHould be
>>>>>>>>> jre8->jdk8->jdk11->jdkAnythingElse
>>>>>>>>> Do you mind to comapre with mine patch? (and honestly say that it is garbage and yours is more
>>>>>>>>> bulletproof - I do not expect more)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I disagree with Your change to JAVA_HOME and PATH - because it can already be jre. On contrary, if
>>>>>>>>> it si jdk, then it is already valid. HAve that part bitten you somewhere?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Really thanx!
>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 2:29 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Then I would suggest the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Does it have sense to check both jre and jsk keys? jre first, and jdk as fallback? If not, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy with ou jre from registy patch. Do you mind to post it as separate patch? In both cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (jre->jdk fallback, jre search only) I will push for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you plan to check more than one regkey than you should check in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following order.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Runtime Environment
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Development Kit
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JDK
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JRE
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. for the last pre-JPMS-jre (max Java 9)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. for the last pre-JPMS-jdk (max Java 8)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. for the last JPMS-jdk ( Java 11+)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. for the last JPMS-jre (max Java 10)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting with Java 11 you have to check the jdk first, because there is
>>>>>>>>>>>> nor jre anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to code that? I would promiss you a beer on fosdem :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 1:54 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jiri.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering why the acinclude hunk is necessary - Do you intend to ship..or whatever custom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itw-binaries built on windows? The build is the only thing I do seriously on windows, and thus I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering why I had never needed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed my jdk direct in windows and not inside cygwin. So my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path inside cygwin is /cygdrive/c/Program\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files/ojdkbuild/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.201-1. This path isn't found by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configure without jdk-home-configure-switch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have it installed to in windows, but something must go differently. Will push this hunk for you asap
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The unittest++ targets are for plugin only,. You should not even hit them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without my changes i get the following error when i make "make clean".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "make: *** No rule to make target 'clean-unittest++', needed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'clean-tests'. Stop."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean-unittest++ is commented out in the generated Makefile because i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build without native plugin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hm interesting, I'm running cleanow and iot works. Anyway will test you changeset, and if ti do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> break anything (which I dubt) will push it for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunce is an problem - ITW, being distribution friendly, can not rely on random cargo pulled from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web. Sorry. If it is really doing such a troubles, then I'm afraid it must go in in way, it can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifouted on linxu. Do you mind to elaborate on this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have an jdk on windows without registry entries and set without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAVA_HOME, than jdk from path is trying. This path is canonicalized and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leads to an unc-path. I have in a test spawn() persuaded (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current_dir) to use this unc-path, but java.exe don't like unc-path in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his classpath.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last hint - if I install JDK on windows. Will it still be found in registry in way you changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you install openjdk with ojdkbuild it will be found. When you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install oracle-jdk and you don't disable "Public JRE" in the installer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it would also be found.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Then I would suggest the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Does it have sense to check both jre and jsk keys? jre first, and jdk as fallback? If not, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy with ou jre from registy patch. Do you mind to post it as separate patch? In both cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (jre->jdk fallback, jre search only) I will push for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Please provide dunce changeset as separate changeset. We have to discuss, how to make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> disable-able.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please reconsider fx patch. I dont think it is necessary. If it is, I would liek to know your case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanx!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lars!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for eyballing the windows state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering why the acinclude hunk is necessary - Do you intend to ship..or whatever custom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itw-binaries built on windows? The build is the only thing I do seriously on windows, and thus I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering why I had never needed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The unittest++ targets are for plugin only,. You should not even hit them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunce is an problem - ITW, being distribution friendly, can not rely on random cargo pulled from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web. Sorry. If it is really doing such a troubles, then I'm afraid it must go in in way, it can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifouted on linxu. Do you mind to elaborate on this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last hint - if I install JDK on windows. Will it still be found in registry in way you changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hmm. The jfxrt is shameful bug, as the path is crippled also in shell and bat launchers an I keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering how it could hapened it was not hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again, thanx a lot for this set of fixes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 11:32 AM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached a patch that cause the following changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acinclude.m4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - configure-switch --with-jdk-home acts on windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makefile.am:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - windows-fix for changeset 1565:7010aa9d9309
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - fixes for make clean with native plugin disabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rust-launcher:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Use cannonicalize from crate dunce, because std::fs:canonicalize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return on windows unc-paths like this \\?\C:\foo. This paths doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work with spawn() from std::process::Command.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Correct path for jfxrt.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Use JRE-path instead of JDK-path from registry and don't panic if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this regkey doesn't exist, because jfxrt.jar, rt.jar and nashorn.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are only in the JRE-directory on openjdk. In addition users, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have only installed JRE don't have the JDK-regkey in your registry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TYVM. Pushed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prerelase binraries will be updated on demand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/19 10:39 AM, Olesya Gerasimenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find attached the updated Russian translation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22.02.2019 14:15, Jiri Vanek пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see the pre-release of icedtea-web 1.8: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can push it through your cases, it would be awesome. There are native portable builds for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both win and Linuxes. There is also multiplatform portable build based on shell/bat launchers only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had also updated (not released!) fedora builds to this pre - see "fedora" text file:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While this prerelase is in testing, I would like to call alive translators - Russian and Czech - to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update theirs translations in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea-web/file/tip/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/resources/. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition, I will start backporting of non-native patches to 1.7 so 1.7.2 can follow 1.8 very soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 will be released once translations are in place. Of course anything wrong reported with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-released tarballs will be fixed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows testing:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.portable.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.win.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * itw-installer.msi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + icedtea-web-1.8pre.tar.gz (sources for custom builds - optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/icedtea-web-docs/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux testng:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * iccedtea-web-1.8pre.linux.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.portable.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.tar.gz (sources for distributions and custom builds - mandatory)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * fedora
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/icedtea-web-docs/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note for JRE search:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * windows shell scripts reads java_home or or registry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * linux shell scripts reads java_home or defualt system jdk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * native launchers reads in addition system paths
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TBH, I doubt I covered all combinations when I run my suites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cases (if you have lack of them, but many of them may be already dead):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web-Tests#javaws
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web-Tests#IcedTea-Web_webstart_.28javaws.29_test_applications
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Known bugs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3705 --- Webstarted application tries to load resources from server incorrectly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3704 --- IcedTeaWeb doesn't run SAP PI web start interface - LAZY_CLASSLOADING_FAILED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3697 --- Custom JRE/JDK within UTF-8 folder name ( key deployment.jre.dir in in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment.properties ) are not properly handled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3689 --- DownloadService2 not implemented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3672 --- Classloader doesn't load jar correctly from JNLP extension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3461 --- (still) Cannot run HP ILO4 remote console application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows desktop shortcuts are suspected to not work with jdk11 and up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Linux side, except native launchers and few bug fixes, not much changed. But for windows support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is giant leap to be finally proper replacement for oracle javaws.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For 1.9 the plan is to remove plugin completely, and to move to github and under the wings of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward for both positive and negative feedbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 244 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20190307/3aa97317/signature-0001.asc>
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list