icedtea-web JSObject

[Jiri Vanek]

Yo-u have jre with fx bundled?
otherwise uninstall of javafx for a while should not be problem.

Another opinion is to build witout plugin.jar and all it sdeps (rhino.jr and friends)  Do you really
need javaws --html support?

/me doubts :)

J.
On 3/25/19 2:00 PM, Ao Qi wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ths means, that you have javafx installed. Java fx have its own implementation of jsobject. If you
>> remove it, all below should disappear.
>>
> 
> Yes, we solve this problem by removing jre/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar. However,
> I wonder if there is a more elegant way? One problem of removing
> jre/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar is that, when building srpm, it is not suitable
> to removing jfxrt.jar of the system jdk.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ao Qi
> 
>> J.
>> On 3/25/19 3:28 AM, huangxg wrote:
>>> When I "make check" on icedtea-web-1.7.1, there will be errors about JSObject, as follows:
>>>
>>> //icedtea-web-1.7/tests/netx/unit/sun/applet/MethodOverloadResolverTest.java:217: error: JSObject is
>>> abstract; cannot be instantiated//
>>> //        assertOverloadOrder(new JSObject(0L), JSObject.class, String.class);//
>>> //                            ^//
>>> ///icedtea-web-1.7/tests/netx/unit/sun/applet/MethodOverloadResolverTest.java:218: error: JSObject
>>> is abstract; cannot be instantiated//
>>> //        assertAmbiguousOverload(new JSObject(0L), Object[].class, String.class);/
>>>
>>> I see in the code that @Test has been commented out, but the code has no comment, so that the test
>>> case will be compiled at compile time.
>>>
>>> /    // Turned off until JSObject is unit-testable (privilege problem)//
>>> ////    @Test//
>>> //    public void testJSObjectOverloading() {//
>>> //        // based on http://jdk6.java.net/plugin2/liveconnect/#OVERLOADED_METHODS//
>>> //        assertOverloadOrder(new JSObject(0L), JSObject.class, String.class);//
>>> //        assertAmbiguousOverload(new JSObject(0L), Object[].class, String.class);//
>>> //    }/
>>>
>>> Can you comment out all the code in this test case? Or is there a way around this mistake?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jiri Vanek
>> Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
>> Red Hat Czech
>> jvanek at redhat.com    M: +420775390109


-- 
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek at redhat.com    M: +420775390109