A simpler model for repeating annotations

[Joel Borggrén-Franck]

On 01/03/2013 02:46 AM, Alex Buckley wrote:
> Having spent today writing out the expected behavior of core reflection
> methods, I'm sympathetic to the idea that get[Declared]Annotations(Class)
> should be more clearly distinguished. I've avoided the term "repeating" in
> API names since repetition is not really the point - the point is multiple
> applications of the same annotation type, but "multiple" has its own
> downsides since there may only be one annotation for the new methods to
> return. I'd favor something more like getAll[Declared]Annotations(Class).
> Comments welcome.
>

getAll* sounds reasonable.

cheers
/Joel