Delayed sponsorship vote on the JDK 6 Project Proposal

Fabiane Bizinella Nardon fabiane at tridedalo.com.br
Wed Jan 16 15:53:18 PST 2008


I agree.

Fabiane


Mark Reinhold wrote:
> Joe Darcy proposed the JDK 6 Project on 14 December [1].
>
> Kelly O'Hair called for the Build Group to vote on sponsoring this
> Project on 7 January [2], and in due course that vote passed [3].
>
> The interim governance rules [4] require that a Group vote to sponsor
> a proposed Project within 14 days, so strictly speaking this vote was
> invalid.  (I'm sure this was an innocent mistake on Kelly's part, most
> likely related to Sun's week-long break over the holidays.)
>
> Rather than ask Joe to resubmit the JDK 6 Project Proposal, I hereby
> request the Interim Governance Board to recognize the Build Group's
> sponsorship vote as valid despite its tardiness.
>
> GB members: Please indicate your agreement (or not) in replies to this
> message.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-December/000051.html
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2008-January/000659.html
> [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2008-January/000696.html
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/
>
>
>   



More information about the gb-discuss mailing list