Trademark license

Donald Smith donald.smith at oracle.com
Fri Feb 3 05:20:11 PST 2012


This was pushed last night:

http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-trademark-notice.html

Cheers,

  - Don

On 01/02/2012 12:44 PM, Donald Smith wrote:
> Coincidentally, this got moved along yesterday and I think it'll just 
> be a day or two to get it posted.
>
>  - Don
>
> On 01/02/2012 12:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:46:56PM -0800, mark.reinhold at oracle.com 
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/11/9 7:13 -0800, mark at klomp.org:
>>>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:10 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>>>> While looking at the trademark license I was surprised to find 
>>>>> version
>>>>> 1.1 at http://openjdk.java.net/legal/openjdk-trademark-notice.html 
>>>>> and
>>>>> in the actual code repositories. A long time ago there was a proposal
>>>>> for a version 1.2 of the trademark license ...
>>>> Sorry for digging up this old topic. But it would be nice to get this
>>>> cleaned up. Especially since the 1.1 version seems to only mention 
>>>> jdk6
>>>> and people are shipping jdk7 variants now.
>>> I'll find someone to take care of this.
>> Did you find someone?
>>
>> I am preparing my Fosdem "Can I legally do that?" talk,
>> and the answer for what can be named how kind of depends
>> on whether the upgraded trademark license will be made official
>> or not. Is there a reason for the delay or is it just that still
>> nobody got to it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark



More information about the gb-discuss mailing list