Inlining methods

[Juan José Fumero Alfonso]

Hi Gary,
   I get the same output with the -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions, only
this:

      62    1     n
com.oracle.graal.hotspot.bridge.CompilerToVMImpl::executeCompiledMethodIntrinsic
(native)   (static)
    168    2     n       java.lang.System::arraycopy (native)   (static)

The option -G:+InlineEverything does not exist in my version.

Thanks
Juan José Fumero




2013/10/25 Frost, Gary <Gary.Frost at amd.com>

> WRT  -XX:+PrintInlining  I think you may also need
> -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions if you are using a product JVM
> build.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: graal-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:
> graal-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Juan José Fumero Alfonso
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Inlining methods
>
> Hello,
> I am working with the OpenCL Component of Graal
> (com.edinburgh.parallel.opencl). This version is not public yet but It uses
> Graal to get the user code and generates OpenCL kernels. I have to create
> an Inlining optimization for my own code using Graal.  Now I have something
> like that:
>
>         GraalCodeCacheProvider runtime =
> Graal.getRequiredCapability(GraalCodeCacheProvider.class);
>         ResolvedJavaMethod javaMethod = runtime.lookupJavaMethod(method);
>
> *        OptimisticOptimizations oo = new
> OptimisticOptimizations(javaMethod);*
>
>
> oo.add(OptimisticOptimizations.Optimization.UseTypeCheckedInlining);
>
> The package is com.oracle.graal.phases;
>
> How can I ensure that the method is inline at the end?  I am using the
> -XX:+PrintCompilation options but there is not much information. Also I
> tried with the -XX:+PrintInlining but it seems this options does not exist.
>  Is this the proper way to get it?
>
>
> Thank you
> Juan José Fumero
>
>
>