Webrev related to JavaCallArguments

[Igor Veresov]

Looks alright.

igor

On Aug 11, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Caspole, Eric <Eric.Caspole at amd.com> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
> I put up a new webrev -
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ecaspole/long_java_args/
> 
> It seems in the JavaCallArguments class there is some kind of assumption that there are less than 8 args when you call the default constructor.
> In this change I use the constructor that takes the args length to avoid the assert shown below, when there are more than 8 arguments. I included a new test that is usually successful to trigger the problem by having a longer running kernel with 9 arguments that notices a safepoint and would assert while handling the never-rans in the cleanup using the current code.
> 
> Also in this webrev I snuck in a TraceTime around kernel generation, it is handy for us to see ow long this takes for various kernels.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric
> 
> #5  report_vm_error (file=0x7ff50d10a2d8 
> "/home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/runtime/javaCalls.cpp", 
> line=505, error_msg=0x7ff50d10a3e0 "guarantee(_is_oop[_pos++] == type) 
> failed", detail_msg=0x7ff50d10a3b0 "signature does not match pushed 
> arguments") at 
> /home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/utilities/debug.cpp:217
> #6  0x00007ff50c9d49b2 in check_value (this=<optimized out>, 
> type=<optimized out>) at 
> /home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/runtime/javaCalls.cpp:505
> #7  check_value (type=true, this=<optimized out>) at 
> /home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/runtime/javaCalls.cpp:570
> #8  check_obj (this=0x7ff50e307370, t=<optimized out>) at 
> /home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/runtime/javaCalls.cpp:557
> #9  SignatureChekker::do_array (this=0x7ff50e307370, begin=<optimized 
> out>, end=<optimized out>) at 
> /home/ecaspole/views/graal-sweep/graal/src/share/vm/runtime/javaCalls.cpp:570