RFR(S) fix assert in CodeInstaller::pd_next_offset() on x86

Vladimir Kozlov vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Fri Dec 19 02:56:49 UTC 2014

Previous message: assert((call[0] == 0x40 || call[0] == 0x41) && call[1] == 0xFF)
Next message: RFR(S) fix assert in CodeInstaller::pd_next_offset() on x86
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/graal_x86_assert_fix/webrev/

According to Intel's manual in 64-bit mode call instructions don't need 
REX prefix. Only REX_B can be added for extended registers.

Thanks,
Vladimir

Previous message: assert((call[0] == 0x40 || call[0] == 0x41) && call[1] == 0xFF)
Next message: RFR(S) fix assert in CodeInstaller::pd_next_offset() on x86
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the graal-dev mailing list