graalCodeInstaller questions, recording scopes, etc.
Deneau, Tom
tom.deneau at amd.com
Thu Jan 2 13:40:47 PST 2014
See below...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Simon [mailto:doug.simon at oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 12:02 PM
> To: Deneau, Tom
> Cc: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: graalCodeInstaller questions, recording scopes, etc.
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Deneau, Tom <tom.deneau at amd.com> wrote:
>
> > Closing the loop again, for my original questions, adding answers
> > below that were relayed in the Skype call on Thursday...
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Deneau, Tom
> >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 3:58 PM
> >> To: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: graalCodeInstaller questions, recording scopes, etc.
> >>
>
> <snip>
>
> > * Our infopoints have byteCodePositions. The ones that get
> >> "recorded" go thru record_scope which has all sorts of
> >> host-specific checking on the scope info. For instance,
> >> get_hotspot_value will compare a register # with
> >> RegisterImpl::number_of_registers (which refers to the host) and
> >> if it is, assert that the type is FLOAT or DOUBLE. None of this
> >> holds with HSAIL registers. What is the best way to resolve
> >> this?
> >>
> >
> > This issue will be handled by the virtualization of some of the calls
> > in graalCodeInstaller that Doug will be implementing.
>
> I made the CodeInstaller class subclassable and the ScopeValue creation
> methods virtual[1]. At some point, I imagine
> CompilerToGPU.generateKernel() will be expanded to incorporate (and
> obsolete) HotSpotCodeCacheProvider.addExternalMethod(). This means the
> code for generateKernel in graalCompilerToGPU.cpp can use a GPU specific
> subclass of CodeInstaller to create GPU ScopeValues.
>
> -Doug
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/graal/graal/rev/03bb0ee05409
Doug --
Just to make sure I understand how we should fit all this together...
* HSAILCompilationResult currently calls providers.getCodeCache()).addExternalMethod
* We already have a HSAILHotSpotCodeCacheProvider so we could override addExternalMethod with
our own version.
* in our own version of addExternalMethod, we could call our own version of vm.installCodeHSAIL
(after adding that to the CompilerToVM interface, this seems messy. Maybe there should be
a installCode in the CompilerToGPU interface)
* installCodeHSAIL would have a line such as
HSAILCodeInstaller installer(compiled_code_handle, result, cb, installed_code_handle, triggered_deoptimizations_handle);
where HSAILCodeInstaller extends CodeInstaller and uses the new virtual methods
Or alternatively (and maybe this is what you are suggesting)
* HSAILCompilationResult calls toGPU.generateKernel before it calls providers.getCodeCache()).addExternalMethod
* the logic for using HSAILCodeInstaller and the rest of the logic in graalCompilerToVM.installCode0
could be added to gpu::hsail::generateKernel
* we would still need some way to get the InstalledCode back (currently returned by addExternalMethod)
so we could store it in the HSAILCompilationResult
-- Tom
More information about the graal-dev
mailing list