OSM issue
Guido Chari
charig at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 13:46:05 UTC 2015
2015-08-12 10:27 GMT-03:00 Stefan Marr <php at stefan-marr.de>:
> Hi Guido:
>
> > On 12 Aug 2015, at 15:20, Guido Chari <charig at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Assuming that you are still experimenting with TruffleSOM, does the
> basic object model already work with it?
> >
> > Did not try. I went straight in the direction of adapting the model for
> using the same number of dynamic fields of the TruffleSOM implementation.
>
> Ok, what’s the reason for that? My choice of number of fields is rather
> arbitrary. I would not expect any issues with just with having 3 long and 4
> object fields as the DynamicObjectBasic class has.
>
Just thought the best way to compare both would be with the same fields but
that is not quite important, i agree. I could use it out of the box. But my
main reason for using the OSM framework, is the possibility to hook from a
standard set of operations for interacting with guest objects. If the idea
is not to extend the basic model, it may be better to just work with the
standard TruffleSOM model.
>
> Best regards
> Stefan
>
>
> --
> Stefan Marr
> Johannes Kepler Universität Linz
> http://stefan-marr.de/research/
>
>
>
>
More information about the graal-dev
mailing list