BitScanForwardNode: LongBits test failure

Andrew Haley aph at
Thu Dec 1 09:19:11 UTC 2016

On 30/11/16 20:19, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> It would probably make sense to make BitScanForwardNode have straightforward semantics and just require the back to deal with the undefined nature 0 for the actual instruction.

Yes, indeed it would.  The current code is baffling.  I'll have a look.


More information about the graal-dev mailing list