RFR: 8313882: Fix -Wconversion warnings in runtime code [v2]
Patricio Chilano Mateo
pchilanomate at openjdk.org
Tue Aug 8 22:17:39 UTC 2023
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 20:09:56 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Here are fixes to silence -Wconversion warnings in runtime code. Use direct cast for 64 bit int to double, otherwise default to checked_cast<>. I changed the declaration of _held_monitor_count and _jni_monitor count to intx to fix cascade of warnings coming from this.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/synchronizer.cpp:1802:41: warning: conversion from 'intx' {aka 'long int'} to 'int' may change value [-Wconversion]
>> 1802 | _thread->dec_held_monitor_count(rec + 1);
>> | ~~~~^~~
>>
>> Tested with tier1-4 on linux-x64-debug and windows-x64-debug and tier1 on Oracle supported platforms.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Make bytecode.hpp index() functions return u2 not long.
src/hotspot/share/runtime/os.cpp line 143:
> 141: milliseconds_since_19700101 / milliseconds_per_microsecond;
> 142: const int milliseconds_after_second =
> 143: checked_cast<int>(milliseconds_since_19700101 % milliseconds_per_microsecond);
Not related to this change but seems milliseconds_per_microsecond should be named milliseconds_per_second.
src/hotspot/share/runtime/safepoint.cpp line 98:
> 96: int initial_number_of_threads,
> 97: int threads_waiting_to_block,
> 98: int iterations) {
Maybe leave iterations as unsigned and change the caller instead?
src/hotspot/share/runtime/sharedRuntime.cpp line 2348:
> 2346: double sum = 0;
> 2347: double weighted_sum = 0;
> 2348: for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) { sum += (double)histo[i]; weighted_sum += (double)(i*histo[i]); }
So hist is a uint64_t*, why can't we make sum and weighted_sum just uint64_t?
src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadHeapSampler.cpp line 359:
> 357: "double and uint64_t do not have the same size");
> 358: x = *reinterpret_cast<const uint64_t*>(&d);
> 359: const uint32_t x_high = (uint32_t)(x >> 32);
Can't we do a checked_cast here? The cast should be reversible with that shift value.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15177#discussion_r1287725795
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15177#discussion_r1287728163
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15177#discussion_r1287734252
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15177#discussion_r1287733638
More information about the graal-dev
mailing list