RFR: 8359227: Code cache/heap size options should be size_t [v3]
Kim Barrett
kbarrett at openjdk.org
Wed Jun 18 15:55:34 UTC 2025
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:52:09 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarrett at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this change that makes the various code cache/heap size options
>> consistently be of type size_t.
>>
>> The shared declarations for these options were all uintx. These options all
>> may have platform-defined values. Some of those platform-specific definitions
>> were uintx, some were size_t, and some were intx(!). This change makes them
>> all consistently size_t.
>>
>> More details in the first comment.
>>
>> Testing: mach5 tier1-6
>> GHA testing in-progress
>
> Kim Barrett has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into code-cache-sizes
> - update copyrights
> - remove leftover <type_traits> include
> - fix whitebox access to code cache size configs
> - VMPageSizeConstraintFunc
> - CodeCacheMinBlockLength
> - CodeCacheExpansionSize
> - various CodeHeapSize options
> - CodeCacheMinimumUseSpace
> - Initial/ReservedCodeCacheSize
> - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ba32b78b...78f1f7b9
Sigh, there are new merge conflicts after the one I just pushed a fix for.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25791#issuecomment-2984799914
More information about the graal-dev
mailing list