[OpenJDK Rasterizer] Marlin #4
Laurent Bourgès
bourges.laurent at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 21:56:21 UTC 2015
Jim,
> My goal is to be able to publish a webrev to the 2D mailing list by
tomorrow so hopefully I'll see a diff soon.
Excellent news !
It would be nice to have a webrev against the GR forest and also a webrev
against 4.2 to streamline reviewing.
I sent you a webrev against the GR forrest on my laptop ie before your last
merge, sorry. I think you will have only a conflict with MarlinUtils: maybe
the SharedSecret usage is now less useful and we should get rid of that
tracing logs anyway.
I do not know how to tell webrev.ksh to perform a webrev between two
intermediate "patches".
> I may do some pushes to the GR-forest on your behalf over the next day
just to save some time in terms of you publishing a webrev and then me
reviewing it and then waiting again for you to do the push. Basically, if
I just get a diff from you for the latest stuff I can work directly from
that.
You're right and I am fine with that sprint: it will save time as I have
another science talk tomorrow morning (in 12h), then driving back home.
Moreover the timezone difference is also annoying.
> Then I'll have to generate the big-diff webrev for pushing to the client
forest and send it out for review on the 2D mailing list.
Seems good. Do you know reviewers that will have time to look at such a big
patch ?
> Moving forward we can use the GR sandbox forest for less formal work and
decide what we want to push to client independently...
Agreed. The GR repository can remain our "dev sandbox" to improve marlin
and you can then merge it to the client forrest when needed.
PS: please give some results about the benchmarks you will run.
Good luck,
Laurent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/graphics-rasterizer-dev/attachments/20151119/54fa84d3/attachment.html>
More information about the graphics-rasterizer-dev
mailing list