RFR: Clarify use of (rel)-pool values [v2]

[Roger Calnan]

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 04:17:22 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   fixed typo
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 222:
> 
>> 220:       * See [Indicating what releases an issue is applicable to](#indicating-what-releases-an-issue-is-applicable-to) for more details.
>> 221:     * For enhancements the [Affects Version/s]{.jbs-field} should be empty unless you feel that the enhancement is only relevant to a particular release family, and shouldn't go into a future mainline release.
>> 222:     * [Affects Version/s]{.jbs-field} should never use any of the "special" values available in JBS like [tbd]{.jbs-value}, [na]{.jbs-value}, [unknown]{.jbs-value}, [(Rel)-pool]{.jbs-value} or similar. Only actual JDK release numbers should be used, if you want to reflect that an issue is relevant to an older release use a family release value: [8]{.jbs-value}, [17]{.jbs-value}.
> 
> Shouldn't you use the actual release version where the existence of the issue was detected? The above sounds to me like you are suggesting to use e.g. 8 even if the issue is actually only applicable for 8uX.

Correct. the actual update version should be used if known.  Spoke with Jesper and he made some suggested changes to the text should should clarify that

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/134#discussion_r1774010952