RFR: Updated AffectsVersion image

Jesper Wilhelmsson jwilhelm at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 7 23:10:53 UTC 2025


On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:04:05 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Updated image to make case 5 look more like the previous cases.
> Also fixed a borken link.

Ah, now I see why we were confused here :-)  (5) is talking about backports while the other cases are about whether something is relevant later or not. I extended the line to show that it originates from mainline. Maybe it would be even more clear if there is a left-arrow at the right end of (5)?

I also did an attempt at cleaning up the file. I'm not sure it's worth it for a single image on such a large page, but I'm also not against removing unnecessary characters :-)

I liked the left-arrow :-) At least now it's obvious that there is something different with (5).

Ok, I made another pass over the descriptions and removed my changes to the image.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/149#issuecomment-2837142864
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/149#issuecomment-2837146840
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/149#issuecomment-3146507018


More information about the guide-dev mailing list