From weijun at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 19:35:19 2025
From: weijun at openjdk.org (Weijun Wang)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:35:19 GMT
Subject: RFR: Fix a typo in guide
Message-ID: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>

`s/RPD2/RDP2/`

-------------

Commit messages:
 - typo

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=144&range=00
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/144/head:pull/144

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144

From iris at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 19:39:09 2025
From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:39:09 GMT
Subject: RFR: Fix a typo in guide
In-Reply-To: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
References: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
Message-ID: <qNC5RmA05bwzWmo-CEEbBXGZPcZ8UawH93H--DEjVx4=.533ff8db-2c83-4b3c-b0a7-a363c1010ed5@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:30:32 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:

> `s/RPD2/RDP2/`

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144#pullrequestreview-2655102710

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 19:42:06 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:42:06 GMT
Subject: RFR: Fix a typo in guide
In-Reply-To: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
References: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
Message-ID: <NWRc9Ou9RYuxihn4pMCYTgOH67QdiO7Pi2TY_ADfxao=.e88b90d5-7a92-4d6c-9531-9f959e639a1f@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:30:32 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:

> `s/RPD2/RDP2/`

@wangweij 
Your change (at version 585283f21f341fa588d3c4fdc864b8c346e8e82c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144#issuecomment-2695369395

From weijun at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 19:48:10 2025
From: weijun at openjdk.org (Weijun Wang)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:48:10 GMT
Subject: Integrated: Fix a typo in guide
In-Reply-To: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
References: <3J1fHLEq-4iOFS_5aDe7ccPZ27ui1ag68ehPDc03xtA=.94de7d68-1bb0-4ae2-8a33-24f91f68eabf@github.com>
Message-ID: <HCDlMbkdp4smqPiKPxh17iazfCbomm7LyuM2k4BDjdY=.db53536d-5ebe-4d24-b9f6-255cad94b74e@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:30:32 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:

> `s/RPD2/RDP2/`

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 52c12ebe
Author:    Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org>
Committer: Iris Clark <iris at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/guide/commit/52c12ebe429f62f5661be74535690e6b2c2adafd
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

Fix a typo in guide

Reviewed-by: iris

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/144

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 21:57:55 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 21:57:55 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received
Message-ID: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>

If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Re-open when info received

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=00
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/145/head:pull/145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Mon Mar  3 22:12:33 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 22:12:33 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v2]
In-Reply-To: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
Message-ID: <qMaDlBRgjkl1xfVn3f8sNSngabo8CboRyQOACdlRT-c=.d4dad408-1a2a-4edb-886e-b0b84651772f@github.com>

> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Fixed grammar

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files/7fb2d0ec..e57d7ca4

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=00-01

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/145/head:pull/145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From iris at openjdk.org  Tue Mar  4 02:47:03 2025
From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark)
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 02:47:03 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v2]
In-Reply-To: <qMaDlBRgjkl1xfVn3f8sNSngabo8CboRyQOACdlRT-c=.d4dad408-1a2a-4edb-886e-b0b84651772f@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
 <qMaDlBRgjkl1xfVn3f8sNSngabo8CboRyQOACdlRT-c=.d4dad408-1a2a-4edb-886e-b0b84651772f@github.com>
Message-ID: <0s6xi7CwARgMgNcuY-YzoyDjhuKCzXnT36CZsWH1YTs=.11a65490-bb37-4a93-a645-a7ea8f94d199@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 22:12:33 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fixed grammar

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 340:

> 338: ### Closing incomplete issues
> 339: 
> 340: As mentioned above, issues that lack the information needed to investigate the problem are placed in status [Resolved]{.jbs-value} - [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}. Triage teams should monitor incomplete issues in their area and if needed ping the relevant person. When new information has been received, the bug should be put back to status [Open]{.jbs-value}. If the required information hasn't been obtained within reasonable time (3-4 weeks) the bug should be closed as [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}.

Perhaps change the tense to "When new information is received, the bug should be returned to status ...".

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145#pullrequestreview-2655783196
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145#discussion_r1978518427

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar  6 18:51:27 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:51:27 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v3]
In-Reply-To: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
Message-ID: <oSpf4cndLROzSnHI_Kw1p1n4QsMnSDrMzTANbH9oO8A=.a1711a4a-4215-4593-a51b-e1a936d993cb@github.com>

> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Review comments

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files/e57d7ca4..07a5e1af

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=01-02

  Stats: 169 lines in 1 file changed: 169 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/145/head:pull/145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar  6 18:51:27 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:51:27 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v2]
In-Reply-To: <0s6xi7CwARgMgNcuY-YzoyDjhuKCzXnT36CZsWH1YTs=.11a65490-bb37-4a93-a645-a7ea8f94d199@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
 <qMaDlBRgjkl1xfVn3f8sNSngabo8CboRyQOACdlRT-c=.d4dad408-1a2a-4edb-886e-b0b84651772f@github.com>
 <0s6xi7CwARgMgNcuY-YzoyDjhuKCzXnT36CZsWH1YTs=.11a65490-bb37-4a93-a645-a7ea8f94d199@github.com>
Message-ID: <QvbV_OLpVZemwXx8jSLp_yAftXtwGbrylVmWmfSl9qs=.b49501e9-bff4-4e85-9b90-81cf1e20397f@github.com>

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 02:44:01 GMT, Iris Clark <iris at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fixed grammar
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 340:
> 
>> 338: ### Closing incomplete issues
>> 339: 
>> 340: As mentioned above, issues that lack the information needed to investigate the problem are placed in status [Resolved]{.jbs-value} - [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}. Triage teams should monitor incomplete issues in their area and if needed ping the relevant person. When new information has been received, the bug should be put back to status [Open]{.jbs-value}. If the required information hasn't been obtained within reasonable time (3-4 weeks) the bug should be closed as [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}.
> 
> Perhaps change the tense to "When new information is received, the bug should be returned to status ...".

Agreed. Fixed.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145#discussion_r1983889480

From iris at openjdk.org  Thu Mar  6 19:19:24 2025
From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:19:24 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v3]
In-Reply-To: <oSpf4cndLROzSnHI_Kw1p1n4QsMnSDrMzTANbH9oO8A=.a1711a4a-4215-4593-a51b-e1a936d993cb@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
 <oSpf4cndLROzSnHI_Kw1p1n4QsMnSDrMzTANbH9oO8A=.a1711a4a-4215-4593-a51b-e1a936d993cb@github.com>
Message-ID: <6NzaPZCBnVVMBzHne0d1U_RNsnSQCfzNI_REcA2ybWA=.f6f4daec-48c6-40cf-b469-8711764d9328@github.com>

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:51:27 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Review comments

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145#pullrequestreview-2665404536

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 13:35:50 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:50 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
Message-ID: <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>

> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos

Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:

 - typo
 - adjustments from feedback

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143/files/b2e31865..47bc8927

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=143&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=143&range=00-01

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/143/head:pull/143

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 13:35:53 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:53 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <G9qowJcGxdO_dyVe3Hv3szc0KNdSSvYuMafnoBWpEIk=.16e7ab92-452e-47ac-a13b-15aed3f13011@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <nZkqnRSnvYUx1QjD-UydXiHwJUgrrAYTksXGknu2MO8=.42c4fca4-33dd-45c8-8c5c-e40043ecb8d6@github.com>
 <G9qowJcGxdO_dyVe3Hv3szc0KNdSSvYuMafnoBWpEIk=.16e7ab92-452e-47ac-a13b-15aed3f13011@github.com>
Message-ID: <qU7iPis9cFzR9UrjVKNnNW_GGnrqGZx6tRPMgBCFAtU=.ff52ccda-7a31-4ee9-810b-d2af5e718665@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:03:09 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 84:
>> 
>>> 82: 1) If an issue is applicable to release N, then it can't be assumed that it is applicable to older releases less than N. It may be, but in general this is less important to know, as the majority of issues are only fixed in the latest feature release. If the issue is a crash or important in another way, then it becomes worthwhile to take the time to determine if it's relevant to earlier LTS releases.
>>> 83: 
>>> 84: Another aspect of an issue is when the feature, it's a part of, was added or removed from the JDK, which in either case limits the range of releases the issue impacts. Knowing that a feature was removed before the oldest currently maintained release means it can be resolved as [Won't Fix]{.jbs-value}.
>> 
>> Maybe "... when a part of the feature was added ...".  I'm not sure because that may change the intent.
>
> This could be more generalized since it doesn't only hold for features, but basically any code.
> "...is when the impacted code was added or..."

done

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 128:
>> 
>>> 126: 2. No need to add additional releases as they are implied.
>>> 127: 3. Adding the occasional LTS release value is ok.
>>> 128: 4. Use N-na to indicate that the issue is no longer relevant from that release, which could be due to the feature or platform being removed or the code has been rewritten.
>> 
>> I think that "being rewritten" was correct since it parallels the earlier "being removed".
>
> Agree with Iris.

reverted the change

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1987287658
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1987288211

From duke at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 13:35:56 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:56 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <nZkqnRSnvYUx1QjD-UydXiHwJUgrrAYTksXGknu2MO8=.42c4fca4-33dd-45c8-8c5c-e40043ecb8d6@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <nZkqnRSnvYUx1QjD-UydXiHwJUgrrAYTksXGknu2MO8=.42c4fca4-33dd-45c8-8c5c-e40043ecb8d6@github.com>
Message-ID: <tkzP3Xk5yDSUjd-CHwG-jvFiQNTdD9WPvJ51TBCthtI=.5882880b-ac8d-44eb-8a27-4f8d42ec8180@github.com>

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:51:43 GMT, Iris Clark <iris at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - typo
>>  - adjustments from feedback
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 739:
> 
>> 737:     <td class="dictionary">[[regression_]{.jbs-label}*(ID)*]{#regression_id}</td>
>> 738:     <td class="dictionary">
>> 739:       **Deprecated.** Was used to identify the fix that caused the regression, where known. Has been replaced by the use of the [caused by]{.jbs-value} link.
> 
> Maybe "**Formerly** used to identify...".
> 
> Also either "**This label** has been replaced by the use..." or "**Replaced** by the use..."

"Formerly" is good, the one thing is that the rest use "Was used".  I'm ok with it being different but just noting that

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1987291604

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 13:42:11 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:42:11 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
Message-ID: <MA47xh-GNb14UtUXEQ9BFdGv2FC8MoAm_gv8rxrxHPk=.d04818ec-816c-4e04-964c-faea91ff2742@github.com>

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:50 GMT, Roger Calnan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos
>
> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - typo
>  - adjustments from feedback

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:

> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
> 434:       Used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12u-fix-request]{.jbs-label}

The `jdk*u-fix-request` labels are used for approval to backport / integrate a fix into an update release rather than after ramp down phase 2. However, the labels without `*u` in release family apply to RDP2.

Also, below sentences mention the label explicitly, this one should do it too: `*(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label}`. It'll make the reference explicit.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1987307393

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 22:20:18 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:20:18 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v4]
In-Reply-To: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
Message-ID: <rg2pmgD99DRx4cCgpkm9EleXBYsKTQ0WI91AUuJnskM=.1979183d-5232-49cd-b9c9-81a358961852@github.com>

> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Label on JEP issue

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files/07a5e1af..1b85f937

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=02-03

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/145/head:pull/145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 22:37:45 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:37:45 GMT
Subject: RFR: Re-open when info received [v5]
In-Reply-To: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
Message-ID: <WAmN0a8WLs9uD6LeHO_FZMHVWV46cXwygE6niaFUkmM=.d0652410-0df9-45dc-af59-c70c2c20c3c8@github.com>

> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Delete file committed by misstake

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145/files/1b85f937..12bbcf8a

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=04
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=145&range=03-04

  Stats: 169 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 169 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/145/head:pull/145

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Mon Mar 10 22:37:45 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:37:45 GMT
Subject: Integrated: Re-open when info received
In-Reply-To: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
References: <rwVFGe-5q9ZJ89VZQz1_oQuuHSM9txS4H9s0CPDzDPs=.59130155-4dc7-4804-a205-4e79e8233822@github.com>
Message-ID: <PMDNl-z2est8PbOztO3x5gVyce5Tx4B8JM68KSVN_8I=.22b0b477-c470-4d6b-a843-fdc246dd982d@github.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 21:53:32 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

> If issues are left as Resolved no-one will notice the new information.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: be88a6de
Author:    Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/guide/commit/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4
Stats:     3 lines in 3 files changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

Re-open when info received

Reviewed-by: iris

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/145

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 00:22:23 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:22:23 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2
Message-ID: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>

Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.

@irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - No localization in RDP2

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=146&range=00
  Stats: 8 lines in 3 files changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/146/head:pull/146

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 00:32:20 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:32:20 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
Message-ID: <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>

> Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.
> 
> @irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Fix typo in label

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146/files/89412d41..8abf8899

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=146&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=146&range=00-01

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/146/head:pull/146

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 00:34:03 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:34:03 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
Message-ID: <aA8NlcEJIuXz-joKCC0egXTrk5DAJYIWoO4sevGFXLc=.bcb4ed8d-8a5c-4495-a264-d49d9633d5c3@github.com>

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:50 GMT, Roger Calnan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos
>
> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - typo
>  - adjustments from feedback

Marked as reviewed by jwilhelm (Lead).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#pullrequestreview-2683664098

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 00:34:03 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:34:03 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <MA47xh-GNb14UtUXEQ9BFdGv2FC8MoAm_gv8rxrxHPk=.d04818ec-816c-4e04-964c-faea91ff2742@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
 <MA47xh-GNb14UtUXEQ9BFdGv2FC8MoAm_gv8rxrxHPk=.d04818ec-816c-4e04-964c-faea91ff2742@github.com>
Message-ID: <K82btKZhu1zlEmtkkuK7hnRCSKgcs6fmP-cQxuWPgyQ=.d64d0a5d-5e44-45b3-b441-29c21927bddd@github.com>

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:39:08 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - typo
>>  - adjustments from feedback
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
> 
>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>> 434:       Used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12u-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
> 
> The `jdk*u-fix-request` labels are used for approval to backport / integrate a fix into an update release rather than after ramp down phase 2. However, the labels without `*u` in release family apply to RDP2.
> 
> Also, below sentences mention the label explicitly, this one should do it too: `*(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label}`. It'll make the reference explicit.

I have made this fix as part of #146. Please have a look to make sure I got it right.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1994476752

From iris at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 02:03:03 2025
From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 02:03:03 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
 <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
Message-ID: <FQAGD6P-X1wsczo5bbi-SHgTkt6frAtzfQ50m3WFtjk=.c8721bc8-8db4-4b4e-a035-1b7e30f22e14@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:32:20 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.
>> 
>> @irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix typo in label

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#pullrequestreview-2683799331

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 16:09:14 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:09:14 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG
Message-ID: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>

Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.

<details>
<summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>

**PNG:**\
![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)

**SVG:**\
![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
</details>

SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Replace affects_versions.png with SVG

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=147&range=00
  Stats: 157 lines in 3 files changed: 156 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/147/head:pull/147

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 16:41:11 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:41:11 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
 <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
Message-ID: <kE2GBt7JgTrA2dJkdgL_RZk4zqHaxstzBaOgjI3TKjE=.6b2eff99-1740-4a9b-adb9-e6d5438909e1@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:32:20 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.
>> 
>> @irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix typo in label

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 340:

> 338: ### Closing incomplete issues
> 339: 
> 340: As mentioned above, issues that lack the information needed to investigate the problem are placed in status [Resolved]{.jbs-value} - [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}. Triage teams should monitor incomplete issues in their area and if needed ping the relevant person. When new information is received, the bug should be returned to status [Open]{.jbs-value}. If the required information hasn't been obtained within reasonable time (3-4 weeks) the bug should be closed as [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}.

Does ??the bug should be closed?? imply that the *Resolved* status changes to *Closed*?

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:

> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
> 434:       *(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label} is used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-request]{.jbs-label}

Should the section be expanded for update releases? The labels like `jdk12u-fix-request` and `jdk24u-fix-request` are constantly used to [request approval for backporting](https://openjdk.org/guide/#requesting-approvals-for-backports) an update release.

The `jdk##-fix-request` and `jdk##u-fix-request` are similar, but they have a different role in the OpenJDK Project.

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 437:

> 435: 
> 436:       *(Rel)*[-fix-SQE-ok]{.jbs-label} is used to indicate that the issue will be covered by the test plan for *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-SQE-ok]{.jbs-label}<br />
> 437:       *(Rel)*[-fix-yes]{.jbs-label} and *(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label} are used to indicate wether an issue has been approved for backport to *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-yes]{.jbs-label}

Yet `jdk12-fix-yes` isn't applicable to backports, it's for post RDP2 integrations (which are also *backports* since the initial fix goes to mainline which is at *Rel+1*). Maybe a different wording should be used to clarify?

src/guide/making-a-change.md line 73:

> 71: ## Changes Late in the Release
> 72: 
> 73: You should always aim to get your changes integrated as early in a release as possible to maximize the amount of testing done before release. If you risk running late it's almost always a better idea to defer the change to the next release rather than trying to squeeze it in in the last minute. The next release is only six months out, the world can wait even though you are eager.

Suggestion:

You should always aim to get your changes integrated as early in a release as possible to maximize the amount of testing done before release. If you risk running late, it's almost always a better idea to defer the change to the next release rather than trying to squeeze it in in the last minute. The next release is only six months away, the world can wait even though you are eager.


A comma after the conditional cause which comes before the main clause helps reading.

I think ?away? is correct when you're referring to an upcoming release; whereas ?out? would imply an already released version six months ago.

*??to squeeze it in in the last minute?* could be hard to read because of two adjacent ?in?s.

src/guide/making-a-change.md line 75:

> 73: You should always aim to get your changes integrated as early in a release as possible to maximize the amount of testing done before release. If you risk running late it's almost always a better idea to defer the change to the next release rather than trying to squeeze it in in the last minute. The next release is only six months out, the world can wait even though you are eager.
> 74: 
> 75: Integrating during the rampdown phase is not recommended. The bar to integrate a change in the rampdown phase is considerably higher than during the normal development phase. See [The JDK Release Process] for more information. Also note that changes that are made late in the release shouldn't expect localization since this in itself takes some time.

Suggestion:

Integrating during the rampdown phase is not recommended. The bar to integrate a change in the rampdown phase is considerably higher than during the normal development phase. See [The JDK Release Process] for more information. Also note changes that are made late in the release shouldn't expect localization since this in itself takes some time.


Is the last sentence easier to read and understand if you omit the relative conjunction ?that??

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1995847429
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1995875143
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1995880459
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1995892111
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1995898511

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 16:43:06 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:43:06 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
Message-ID: <2IaEJGMcHzffiRXiJqtmXTRt1SLq5AJlisPHPdrTHaU=.b0b841b9-33a3-43fe-9bd6-14c0e873a4ad@github.com>

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:35:50 GMT, Roger Calnan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos
>
> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - typo
>  - adjustments from feedback

Marked as reviewed by aivanov (no project role).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#pullrequestreview-2686150060

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 16:43:06 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:43:06 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <K82btKZhu1zlEmtkkuK7hnRCSKgcs6fmP-cQxuWPgyQ=.d64d0a5d-5e44-45b3-b441-29c21927bddd@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
 <NqAgkTNJEfjyKc1NLy3Pi0Gn0lvMA5GLfVO7gGis0Nw=.18f1ecef-ff36-4844-987b-e0610b66d107@github.com>
 <MA47xh-GNb14UtUXEQ9BFdGv2FC8MoAm_gv8rxrxHPk=.d04818ec-816c-4e04-964c-faea91ff2742@github.com>
 <K82btKZhu1zlEmtkkuK7hnRCSKgcs6fmP-cQxuWPgyQ=.d64d0a5d-5e44-45b3-b441-29c21927bddd@github.com>
Message-ID: <56x0wfqBhcfqZbv2z8ujTb91IqDZ0Z6GPvwFaVOp5vo=.16e359f7-95a5-457b-80fd-73fb257de728@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:30:24 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
>> 
>>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>>> 434:       Used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12u-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
>> 
>> The `jdk*u-fix-request` labels are used for approval to backport / integrate a fix into an update release rather than after ramp down phase 2. However, the labels without `*u` in release family apply to RDP2.
>> 
>> Also, below sentences mention the label explicitly, this one should do it too: `*(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label}`. It'll make the reference explicit.
>
> I have made this fix as part of #146. Please have a look to make sure I got it right.

Shall this `s/get/be/` dropped from this PR to avoid conflict in #146?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143#discussion_r1995901880

From ihse at openjdk.org  Fri Mar 14 18:35:25 2025
From: ihse at openjdk.org (Magnus Ihse Bursie)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:35:25 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG
In-Reply-To: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
Message-ID: <YZU-Xy5-2H2dzCYktiiY4Z9_80OU3Zi86WF6c53pWBY=.feabf33d-d38d-4ad2-9b51-403701070b08@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:04:56 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.
> 
> <details>
> <summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>
> 
> **PNG:**\
> ![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)
> 
> **SVG:**\
> ![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
> </details>
> 
> SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.

Nice!

-------------

Marked as reviewed by ihse (Committer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147#pullrequestreview-2686399698

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Sat Mar 15 00:54:05 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:54:05 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <kE2GBt7JgTrA2dJkdgL_RZk4zqHaxstzBaOgjI3TKjE=.6b2eff99-1740-4a9b-adb9-e6d5438909e1@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
 <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
 <kE2GBt7JgTrA2dJkdgL_RZk4zqHaxstzBaOgjI3TKjE=.6b2eff99-1740-4a9b-adb9-e6d5438909e1@github.com>
Message-ID: <s-z53iTM4Oc8dfgIzx7E3Dnrcxu9hCOwF8CJBeXZHyc=.b99b36fc-6a2a-40f4-993b-0010f39a730b@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:07:41 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fix typo in label
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 340:
> 
>> 338: ### Closing incomplete issues
>> 339: 
>> 340: As mentioned above, issues that lack the information needed to investigate the problem are placed in status [Resolved]{.jbs-value} - [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}. Triage teams should monitor incomplete issues in their area and if needed ping the relevant person. When new information is received, the bug should be returned to status [Open]{.jbs-value}. If the required information hasn't been obtained within reasonable time (3-4 weeks) the bug should be closed as [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}.
> 
> Does ??the bug should be closed?? imply that the *Resolved* status changes to *Closed*?

Yes.

> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
> 
>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>> 434:       *(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label} is used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
> 
> Should the section be expanded for update releases? The labels like `jdk12u-fix-request` and `jdk24u-fix-request` are constantly used to [request approval for backporting](https://openjdk.org/guide/#requesting-approvals-for-backports) an update release.
> 
> The `jdk##-fix-request` and `jdk##u-fix-request` are similar, but they have a different role in the OpenJDK Project.

I'd be happy to include such an update. Could you write the text, either here in a comment or as a separate change?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1996470178
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1996470497

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Sat Mar 15 01:09:02 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 01:09:02 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG
In-Reply-To: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
Message-ID: <oHYPBdtrGJMhBQOlaYrJxspPQf1tXZcDI_1Ya1at7Mg=.4ad35eda-4347-44d4-b9b7-0a5d3b55450a@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:04:56 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.
> 
> <details>
> <summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>
> 
> **PNG:**\
> ![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)
> 
> **SVG:**\
> ![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
> </details>
> 
> SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.

Indeed nice!
As you are in the area... ;-)  I think it would make more sense if case 4 didn't end with an arrow pointing at 12-na, but rather ends with a tilted "T" .. as in "--| 12-na". The arrow could be interpreted as the issue lives on.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147#issuecomment-2726083272

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Tue Mar 18 20:03:34 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:03:34 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG [v2]
In-Reply-To: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
Message-ID: <kJ0XqWQ08bPyJOWZgkdkjHw4v1gJOoFBGTtZTOAIpeg=.977fa266-56d0-45f1-aa4e-ad4f9fefc845@github.com>

> Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.
> 
> <details>
> <summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>
> 
> **PNG:**\
> ![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)
> 
> **SVG:**\
> ![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
> </details>
> 
> SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.

Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:

 - Red cross under 11-wnf
 - Dashed line to 12-na label
 - End 12-na with T-like instead of arrow

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147/files/bc65ea67..3a13348b

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=147&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=147&range=00-01

  Stats: 10 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/147/head:pull/147

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Tue Mar 18 20:08:20 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:08:20 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG
In-Reply-To: <oHYPBdtrGJMhBQOlaYrJxspPQf1tXZcDI_1Ya1at7Mg=.4ad35eda-4347-44d4-b9b7-0a5d3b55450a@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
 <oHYPBdtrGJMhBQOlaYrJxspPQf1tXZcDI_1Ya1at7Mg=.4ad35eda-4347-44d4-b9b7-0a5d3b55450a@github.com>
Message-ID: <zQED6VLKAg1zo8bTXbxvK2uvj6GltPOe-doKpf_QB-w=.3560263f-3c72-4bb5-95e4-f3f27960d757@github.com>

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 01:06:48 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

> ?if case 4 didn't end with an arrow pointing at 12-na, but rather ends with a tilted "T" .. as in "--| 12-na". The arrow could be interpreted as the issue lives on.

That's a good idea.

I made it end with with ?? and made the line for 12 dashed/dotted.

Should I use the circle as in case 5 for consistency? The circle seem to represent that an issue is fixed in that release, in other words, the issue is fixed in 11, but it's not applicable to 12 and above.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147#issuecomment-2734574036

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Tue Mar 18 21:03:24 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 21:03:24 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v3]
In-Reply-To: <lJFosDRpIEL2bl5-I1grcnJRuKYnM-90SNXs971sdcc=.42203b8d-0d4e-4b2c-bc8a-f077041ad71b@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
 <lJFosDRpIEL2bl5-I1grcnJRuKYnM-90SNXs971sdcc=.42203b8d-0d4e-4b2c-bc8a-f077041ad71b@github.com>
Message-ID: <Qf7ePjbaKUlbI0D-eqkzMYG_jy8gLqkx8abI0Iu18j8=.c8164c6d-44bf-4a7c-83f6-f65a5002cc0e@github.com>

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 01:01:23 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.
>> 
>> @irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update src/guide/making-a-change.md
>   
>   Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.ivanov at oracle.com>

Marked as reviewed by aivanov (no project role).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#pullrequestreview-2696273969

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Tue Mar 18 21:03:24 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 21:03:24 GMT
Subject: RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]
In-Reply-To: <s-z53iTM4Oc8dfgIzx7E3Dnrcxu9hCOwF8CJBeXZHyc=.b99b36fc-6a2a-40f4-993b-0010f39a730b@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
 <u9zO7kD7UDa4xPFshcLRPJlWMYfwI5yTUWJ_OBbPa1g=.ab6b988e-fc9d-48d5-b3e7-434ebbb6b4d8@github.com>
 <kE2GBt7JgTrA2dJkdgL_RZk4zqHaxstzBaOgjI3TKjE=.6b2eff99-1740-4a9b-adb9-e6d5438909e1@github.com>
 <s-z53iTM4Oc8dfgIzx7E3Dnrcxu9hCOwF8CJBeXZHyc=.b99b36fc-6a2a-40f4-993b-0010f39a730b@github.com>
Message-ID: <-6vZ4n35FAPo03BeLOOc55HyYq8Xyb0KhPBZOkTGzso=.0d753375-837f-4f65-bb36-e097e384937f@github.com>

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:51:25 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
>> 
>>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>>> 434:       *(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label} is used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
>> 
>> Should the section be expanded for update releases? The labels like `jdk12u-fix-request` and `jdk24u-fix-request` are constantly used to [request approval for backporting](https://openjdk.org/guide/#requesting-approvals-for-backports) an update release.
>> 
>> The `jdk##-fix-request` and `jdk##u-fix-request` are similar, but they have a different role in the OpenJDK Project.
>
> I'd be happy to include such an update. Could you write the text, either here in a comment or as a separate change?

Yeah, it makes sense to expand the section in another PR.

> I don't think so. Your suggestion would require a comma after "note", and I don't think that sentence would be easier to read.

You're right. The sentence is easier to understand with both ?that? on their own places.

> It could be simplified by removing "that are" (the second that) instead.

No, the second ?that? can't be removed because it's the subject of the dependent sentence ?that are made late in the release? which describes _changes_.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r2002007684
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r2002004271

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Wed Mar 19 15:24:26 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:24:26 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG
In-Reply-To: <zQED6VLKAg1zo8bTXbxvK2uvj6GltPOe-doKpf_QB-w=.3560263f-3c72-4bb5-95e4-f3f27960d757@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
 <oHYPBdtrGJMhBQOlaYrJxspPQf1tXZcDI_1Ya1at7Mg=.4ad35eda-4347-44d4-b9b7-0a5d3b55450a@github.com>
 <zQED6VLKAg1zo8bTXbxvK2uvj6GltPOe-doKpf_QB-w=.3560263f-3c72-4bb5-95e4-f3f27960d757@github.com>
Message-ID: <Wno3jR6Wl6TTwkvj3DToLpEyGBV3crfx4fkGoMl8iRs=.eb949b1e-bff0-4251-8721-560dea528bf5@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:05:33 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > ?if case 4 didn't end with an arrow pointing at 12-na, but rather ends with a tilted "T" .. as in "--| 12-na". The arrow could be interpreted as the issue lives on.
> 
> That's a good idea.
> 
> I made it end with with ?? and made the line for 12 dashed/dotted.

The current version with T-like end for ?12-na?:\
![Affects Versions where ?12-na? line ends with a ?T?-like end](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjdk/guide/3a13348b52530dcfbdf45d6819a3677fddb63123/src/images/affects_versions.svg)

> Should I use the circle as in case 5 for consistency? The circle seem to represent that an issue is fixed in that release, in other words, the issue is fixed in 11, but it's not applicable to 12 and above.

The version which ends 12-na line with a circle:\
![Affects Versions where ?12-na? line ends with a circle](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjdk/guide/b994bb25ed2237483a0f0ea2acd9dc532b0d6454/src/images/affects_versions.svg)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147#issuecomment-2737050277

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 15:30:30 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:30:30 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG [v2]
In-Reply-To: <kJ0XqWQ08bPyJOWZgkdkjHw4v1gJOoFBGTtZTOAIpeg=.977fa266-56d0-45f1-aa4e-ad4f9fefc845@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
 <kJ0XqWQ08bPyJOWZgkdkjHw4v1gJOoFBGTtZTOAIpeg=.977fa266-56d0-45f1-aa4e-ad4f9fefc845@github.com>
Message-ID: <Nd3STezhrrPOyooC1xWS5WXA197g32s8K5lOuOHtXio=.fd1b1ca8-94de-422a-8a82-31dc4fdd4440@github.com>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:03:34 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.
>> 
>> <details>
>> <summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>
>> 
>> **PNG:**\
>> ![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)
>> 
>> **SVG:**\
>> ![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
>> </details>
>> 
>> SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.
>
> Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Red cross under 11-wnf
>  - Dashed line to 12-na label
>  - End 12-na with T-like instead of arrow

Yes actually the circle makes sense as it's consistent with 5.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147#issuecomment-2740853853

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 15:35:40 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:35:40 GMT
Subject: Integrated: No localization in RDP2
In-Reply-To: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
References: <mWxI174vi4CYt6_o6g5Q2KkArZQJja67d_QWwYUow-U=.c7500985-1ebe-4885-9d9e-51d2495e1a1a@github.com>
Message-ID: <QSBNt_Fqd2G9qCBT2ci63B6SN1moYhnaCJZ_UTGrsvc=.23434c99-47cd-4191-a385-525150ec1aca@github.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:17:40 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Localization can't be expected for changes made in RDP2.
> 
> @irisclark This change also contain your fixes from #145 that I apparently didn't commit before integrating.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: a0d2befb
Author:    Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/guide/commit/a0d2befb5e818aacc157a4a12ac5e9a1b74ee719
Stats:     11 lines in 3 files changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 5 mod

No localization in RDP2

Reviewed-by: iris, aivanov

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 15:45:00 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:45:00 GMT
Subject: RFR: Reminder to remove label [v2]
In-Reply-To: <lnxQXLCyg_mTY_Hdq3dU3i1e9srSvSzuz_mjsXyrB4E=.c6612d25-83cc-4d1e-b520-2b74cc5f6d04@github.com>
References: <lnxQXLCyg_mTY_Hdq3dU3i1e9srSvSzuz_mjsXyrB4E=.c6612d25-83cc-4d1e-b520-2b74cc5f6d04@github.com>
Message-ID: <6-DQS-U0Dfecx_SdoaxTxkCicifmwuYGZSYfD1DKo40=.9cd60b84-c05a-4d5c-9642-46bcc8cd9660@github.com>

> Reminder to remove label

Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Can instead of should

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/136/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/136/files/a1e123af..be7262e6

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=136&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=136&range=00-01

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/136.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/136/head:pull/136

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/136

From jwilhelm at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 15:45:01 2025
From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:45:01 GMT
Subject: Integrated: Reminder to remove label
In-Reply-To: <lnxQXLCyg_mTY_Hdq3dU3i1e9srSvSzuz_mjsXyrB4E=.c6612d25-83cc-4d1e-b520-2b74cc5f6d04@github.com>
References: <lnxQXLCyg_mTY_Hdq3dU3i1e9srSvSzuz_mjsXyrB4E=.c6612d25-83cc-4d1e-b520-2b74cc5f6d04@github.com>
Message-ID: <Q8VL03LQm_ZFKJopl6DOPAoX0jwBAMydOt2VHNuyGvo=.75e49c8b-1506-471d-9f76-cc4a6f1bc8e7@github.com>

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:22:04 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Reminder to remove label

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 90778521
Author:    Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/guide/commit/907785214ce3129b5594e1b2b39cd9f4fad20f30
Stats:     1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod

Reminder to remove label

Reviewed-by: iris, aivanov

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/136

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 16:45:32 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:45:32 GMT
Subject: RFR: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links
 [v3]
In-Reply-To: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
Message-ID: <RDQNcRPtaTkoCuyupU7KixgcZX0kx47HlneZXX19DqM=.4dda15d2-db33-433d-a577-9eda71769df4@github.com>

> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos

Roger Calnan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains five commits:

 - Merge branch 'master' into causes-link-followon
 - typo
 - adjustments from feedback
 - small update to deprecated sentence
 - Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=143&range=02
  Stats: 5 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/143/head:pull/143

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 16:45:32 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:45:32 GMT
Subject: Integrated: Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by
 links
In-Reply-To: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
References: <Gh3SabkLGEmoWLw6cKersOkdgFQLiQR_N0-9j9OhB90=.1cd1ff8c-34c9-4447-abaf-bee63b7876ee@github.com>
Message-ID: <HHYMCTibF1JogdmQWhr1TXpKXLXCir5n-fi0lk5P4I4=.1d5ae92e-474b-4c10-b921-565ccb24073d@github.com>

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:57:39 GMT, Roger Calnan <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Noted that the label regression_ID is now deprecated and a caused-by link should be used.  Fixed a couple of typos

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: a7c63ab1
Author:    roger_calnan <roger.calnan at oracle.com>
Committer: Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/guide/commit/a7c63ab114348ce25bbe3adb40fc13abb1ed067b
Stats:     5 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 4 mod

Follow-on update due to the introduction of caused-by links

Reviewed-by: jwilhelm, aivanov

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/143

From aivanov at openjdk.org  Thu Mar 20 17:07:12 2025
From: aivanov at openjdk.org (Alexey Ivanov)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:07:12 GMT
Subject: RFR: Replace affects_versions.png with SVG [v3]
In-Reply-To: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
References: <2EVDtsXtXKolQJ6k6ef9gy64Su5EpyuV9bI73LGTAdw=.7d04b867-59f1-4f01-9687-42828fcda22a@github.com>
Message-ID: <GN8fTaIKCiP_8KrwC-PWdIAIiS8C9v8t-ZlVAA87Ws8=.676e48f9-88c0-4738-bf70-19acefc3191a@github.com>

> Replace `affects_versions.png` with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image.
> 
> <details>
> <summary>PNG vs SVG</summary>
> 
> **PNG:**\
> ![affects_versions.png](https://github.com/openjdk/guide/blob/be88a6debcb0dfb7f8fb0e8f3e95ff35950ca9c4/src/images/affects_versions.png?raw=true)
> 
> **SVG:**\
> ![affects_versions.svg](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aivanov-jdk/dev-guide/bc65ea67251cc68360fc746a77200d8c93fd78b5/src/images/affects_versions.svg)
> </details>
> 
> SVG is crisper, especially on High DPI monitors, its size is much smaller (1.04&nbsp;KB vs 26.24&nbsp;KB), it's easier to edit and the edit history is preserved.

Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  End 12-na with circle

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147/files/3a13348b..c48bff06

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=147&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=147&range=01-02

  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/147/head:pull/147

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/147