RFR: Select component when filing issue [v4]

[Alexey Ivanov]

On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 13:08:26 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Added missing info about components when filing a JBS issue
>> Also clarified how to close a resolved issue through verification
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   . and link

Changes requested by aivanov (no project role).

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 288:

> 286: When a change is integrated into a project repository, the corresponding JBS issue should be [Resolved]{.jbs-value} with the resolution [Fixed]{.jbs-value}. For the JDK Project, in almost all cases the bots will transition the issue to [Resolved]{.jbs-value}/[Fixed]{.jbs-value} automatically when the changeset is integrated. There are a few more cases where you want to indicate that a change has been integrated into a project repository that must also go through the [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state. In other cases, where you close an issue manually, it should go directly to [Closed]{.jbs-value} with the appropriate resolution. See the [table below](#close-resolve-table) for more details.
> 287: 
> 288: An issue in [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state needs to go through [verification](#verifying-an-issue) to end up as [Closed]{.jbs-value}. If you accidentally end up in a [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state for a resolution that should only be [Closed]{.jbs-value}, use the "Verify" option in the state transition menu and select verification [None]{.jbs-value}.

Suggestion:

An issue in the [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state needs to go through [verification](#verifying-an-issue) to end up as [Closed]{.jbs-value}. If you transition an issue to [Resolved]{.jbs-value} when it should be [Closed]{.jbs-value}, use the "Verify" option in the state transition menu and select verification [None]{.jbs-value}.

What do you think about this version? We can keep “accidentally” or replace it with “mistakenly”.

In the first sentence, “to end up” could be replaced with “to reach” (…the Closed state).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/169#pullrequestreview-3763197371
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/169#discussion_r2774227290