RFR: Select component when filing issue [v4]

[Alexey Ivanov]

On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:51:40 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 288:
>> 
>>> 286: When a change is integrated into a project repository, the corresponding JBS issue should be [Resolved]{.jbs-value} with the resolution [Fixed]{.jbs-value}. For the JDK Project, in almost all cases the bots will transition the issue to [Resolved]{.jbs-value}/[Fixed]{.jbs-value} automatically when the changeset is integrated. There are a few more cases where you want to indicate that a change has been integrated into a project repository that must also go through the [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state. In other cases, where you close an issue manually, it should go directly to [Closed]{.jbs-value} with the appropriate resolution. See the [table below](#close-resolve-table) for more details.
>>> 287: 
>>> 288: An issue in [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state needs to go through [verification](#verifying-an-issue) to end up as [Closed]{.jbs-value}. If you accidentally end up in a [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state for a resolution that should only be [Closed]{.jbs-value}, use the "Verify" option in the state transition menu and select verification [None]{.jbs-value}.
>> 
>> Suggestion:
>> 
>> An issue in the [Resolved]{.jbs-value} state needs to go through [verification](#verifying-an-issue) to end up as [Closed]{.jbs-value}. If you transition an issue to [Resolved]{.jbs-value} when it should be [Closed]{.jbs-value}, use the "Verify" option in the state transition menu and select verification [None]{.jbs-value}.
>> 
>> What do you think about this version? We can keep “accidentally” or replace it with “mistakenly”. (I dropped it completely in my suggestion above.)
>> 
>> In the first sentence, “to end up” could be replaced with “to reach” (…the Closed state).
>
> Yep, I like that better. I want to keep it light to not accuse a person for doing a mistake.

But you applied the previous suggestion rather than this.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/169#discussion_r2775561446