RFR: Clarified the Affects version section [v4]

[Jesper Wilhelmsson]

On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 12:12:31 GMT, Joakim Nordström <jnordstrom at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Clarification for the [Affects version section](https://openjdk.org/guide/#usage-of-the-rel-na-label)
>> 
>> * Removed some newlines so things are kept in one paragraph
>> * Changed some wording to make the _don'ts_ a bit clearer
>
> Joakim Nordström has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Updated rel-na and rel-wnf link

src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 108:

> 106: - Don't use the label to indicate that a bug is not relevant to an earlier release. If for example [Affects Version/s]{.jbs-field} is [11.0.20]{.jbs-value}, [17]{.jbs-value} the label [8-na]{.jbs-label} would not be needed. Since the bug doesn't have [Affects Version/s]{.jbs-field} [8]{.jbs-value} or earlier, it is not relevant to JDK 8. See also how to [use (Rel)-[wnf]{.jbs-label} Label when a bug won't be fixed in a release](#use-rel-wnf-label-when-a-bug-wont-be-fixed-in-a-release).
> 107: 
> 108: - Never add multiple [-na]{.jbs-label} labels. For example don't add both [9-na]{.jbs-label} and [11-na]{.jbs-label} — the [9-na]{.jbs-label} label implies all following releases therefore [11-na]{.jbs-label}, or [17-na]{.jbs-label} etc. are not needed.

"the 9-na label implies all following releases therefore 11-na, or 17-na etc. are not needed."  reads a bit weird. Should there be a comma after "releases"? Or maybe even a period?  Maybe the "are" should move? "Therefore are 11-na, or 17-na etc. not needed."

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/170#discussion_r2830806992