From duke at openjdk.org Fri Jan 9 13:25:47 2026 From: duke at openjdk.org (Roger Calnan) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 13:25:47 GMT Subject: RFR: cover the documentation linking options in release notes [v4] In-Reply-To: <_GdkmUGPtT-gHboZji92kZDpvuaQMMDu8DlExidSTaw=.ddb3682f-4f31-4b10-ab7e-520f8771c71a@github.com> References: <_GdkmUGPtT-gHboZji92kZDpvuaQMMDu8DlExidSTaw=.ddb3682f-4f31-4b10-ab7e-520f8771c71a@github.com> Message-ID: <5acY44Zi_HDx8D95Ng8wXurCYb26TqI4KQI9GGuvwbU=.46c7c056-62a4-4ce4-9034-7eb95264e408@github.com> > added an explanation on the support of JavaDoc like links and the automatic linking of JBS IDs Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: additional notes ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167/files/c8597bd8..f2737a69 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=167&range=03 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=167&range=02-03 Stats: 5 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/167/head:pull/167 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167 From iris at openjdk.org Mon Jan 12 17:48:23 2026 From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:48:23 GMT Subject: RFR: cover the documentation linking options in release notes [v4] In-Reply-To: <5acY44Zi_HDx8D95Ng8wXurCYb26TqI4KQI9GGuvwbU=.46c7c056-62a4-4ce4-9034-7eb95264e408@github.com> References: <_GdkmUGPtT-gHboZji92kZDpvuaQMMDu8DlExidSTaw=.ddb3682f-4f31-4b10-ab7e-520f8771c71a@github.com> <5acY44Zi_HDx8D95Ng8wXurCYb26TqI4KQI9GGuvwbU=.46c7c056-62a4-4ce4-9034-7eb95264e408@github.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 13:25:47 GMT, Roger Calnan wrote: >> added an explanation on the support of JavaDoc like links and the automatic linking of JBS IDs > > Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: > > additional notes Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). src/guide/release-notes.md line 86: > 84: * Links of the form `[NumberFormat.setStrict]`, `[NumberFormat.setStrict(boolean)]`, `[NumberFormat.setStrict(true)]`, `[ofFileChannel(FileChannel channel, long offset, long length)]` are supported with any of the separators `[.]`, `[#]` and `[::]`. > 85: * If a link cannot be found then the string will be rendered as if it had been enclosed in back-ticks and, in the EA release notes only, the string "(link not found)" will be added. > 86: * For notes of the type `rn-removed` if a link is not found then it will be looked for in the JavaDoc of the previous release family. In the Guide's "RN Labels" section, you use "RN-Remove" as the name of the label. Should the case match? Also, suggest adding link to the Guides' definition of the label. ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167#pullrequestreview-3651957577 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167#discussion_r2683270765 From jwilhelm at openjdk.org Mon Jan 12 23:30:08 2026 From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:30:08 GMT Subject: RFR: cover the documentation linking options in release notes [v4] In-Reply-To: References: <_GdkmUGPtT-gHboZji92kZDpvuaQMMDu8DlExidSTaw=.ddb3682f-4f31-4b10-ab7e-520f8771c71a@github.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 18:45:51 GMT, Roger Calnan wrote: >> src/guide/release-notes.md line 81: >> >>> 79: >>> 80: * the linking options defined in JavaDoc [MarkDown](https://openjdk.org/jeps/467#Links) are supported. >>> 81: * links to the JDK tools is supported. To differentiate between `[JarSigner]` the class, and `[jarsigner]` the tool, the tool reference should be in all lowercase. >> >> I think it would be nice if "JDK tools" was a link to the tools page. I know it's version specific, but the JDK 25 page should be good enough for a few years :-) > > you mean [JDK tools] should be a link to the tools page? Yes, in the sentence "links to the JDK tools is supported." ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167#discussion_r2684225936 From jwilhelm at openjdk.org Mon Jan 12 23:30:11 2026 From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:30:11 GMT Subject: RFR: cover the documentation linking options in release notes [v4] In-Reply-To: References: <_GdkmUGPtT-gHboZji92kZDpvuaQMMDu8DlExidSTaw=.ddb3682f-4f31-4b10-ab7e-520f8771c71a@github.com> <5acY44Zi_HDx8D95Ng8wXurCYb26TqI4KQI9GGuvwbU=.46c7c056-62a4-4ce4-9034-7eb95264e408@github.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:44:32 GMT, Iris Clark wrote: >> Roger Calnan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: >> >> additional notes > > src/guide/release-notes.md line 86: > >> 84: * Links of the form `[NumberFormat.setStrict]`, `[NumberFormat.setStrict(boolean)]`, `[NumberFormat.setStrict(true)]`, `[ofFileChannel(FileChannel channel, long offset, long length)]` are supported with any of the separators `[.]`, `[#]` and `[::]`. >> 85: * If a link cannot be found then the string will be rendered as if it had been enclosed in back-ticks and, in the EA release notes only, the string "(link not found)" will be added. >> 86: * For notes of the type `rn-removed` if a link is not found then it will be looked for in the JavaDoc of the previous release family. > > In the Guide's "RN Labels" section, you use "RN-Remove" as the name of the label. Should the case match? Also, suggest adding link to the Guides' definition of the label. Good catch Iris! The case should match. Also it should be [RN-Remove]{.jbs-value} ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/167#discussion_r2684231827 From missa at openjdk.org Wed Jan 21 23:15:40 2026 From: missa at openjdk.org (Mohamed Issa) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 23:15:40 GMT Subject: RFR: Minor spelling correction in guide Message-ID: This changes fixes a typo in the **Reviewing and Sponsoring a Change** section of the guide. ------------- Commit messages: - Correct spelling - Reviever to Reviewer Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=guide&pr=168&range=00 Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/guide.git pull/168/head:pull/168 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168 From jwilhelm at openjdk.org Thu Jan 22 16:19:47 2026 From: jwilhelm at openjdk.org (Jesper Wilhelmsson) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:19:47 GMT Subject: RFR: Minor spelling correction in guide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 23:09:28 GMT, Mohamed Issa wrote: > This changes fixes a typo in the **Reviewing and Sponsoring a Change** section of the guide. Marked as reviewed by jwilhelm (Lead). Good catch! ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168#pullrequestreview-3693319485 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168#issuecomment-3785289046 From iris at openjdk.org Thu Jan 22 17:54:50 2026 From: iris at openjdk.org (Iris Clark) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:54:50 GMT Subject: RFR: Minor spelling correction in guide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8Ain9sD8zwl7WZvTtRHCnrDuyg4dUI-Aw5KSbr9vXSs=.800e928f-fb80-4d47-a8ee-6b2ff21c628a@github.com> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 23:09:28 GMT, Mohamed Issa wrote: > This changes fixes a typo in the **Reviewing and Sponsoring a Change** section of the guide. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168#pullrequestreview-3693785166 From duke at openjdk.org Thu Jan 22 18:23:07 2026 From: duke at openjdk.org (duke) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:23:07 GMT Subject: RFR: Minor spelling correction in guide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 23:09:28 GMT, Mohamed Issa wrote: > This changes fixes a typo in the **Reviewing and Sponsoring a Change** section of the guide. @missa-prime Your change (at version 2b5ed9176dbe734aab8c7d51f6a1f745330e7f36) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/168#issuecomment-3785978576