Developers' Guide: 0.02

[Martijn Verburg]

Hi all,

Great stuff, good to see this getting updated!

When further work is planned please do let me know - we have a quite a
stack of documentation building up in the Adopt OpenJDK project, especially
around working with source code on modern IDEs, we'd love to see this sort
of thing move into OpenJDK proper.

Cheers,
Martijn


On 8 November 2012 08:02, Mike Duigou <mike.duigou at oracle.com> wrote:

> This kind of change may seem minor but it does make a very positive
> difference. New users approaching the project are undoubtably put off or
> made nervous seeing very stale documents. Out of date docs really kill
> confidence that a project is a "going concern".
>
> Mike
>
> On Nov 7 2012, at 18:24 , Iris Clark wrote:
>
> Hi!****
> ** **
> Just thought I’d let you know that I just pushed an update to the Guide
> [1] (webrev [2]).  Don’t get too excited, all I did was a quick pass to
> remove the obviously incorrect (e.g. s/Sun/Oracle/g),  eliminate references
> to plans that never materialized or things that longer exist, run it
> through the W3C Markup Validator, and bump the version number/date.  ****
> ** **
> There’s still additional work that could be done.  There’s no grand plan
> here.  It just made me sad to see the Guide languishing for attention.****
> ****
> Thanks,****
> iris****
> ** **
> [1]:  http://openjdk.java.net/guide/****
> [2]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/guide/20121107/****
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/guide-discuss/attachments/20121108/a4dfad0a/attachment.html