Developers' Guide: 0.02

[Kelly O'Hair]

+1

Thanks Iris!

-kto

On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:

> This kind of change may seem minor but it does make a very positive difference. New users approaching the project are undoubtably put off or made nervous seeing very stale documents. Out of date docs really kill confidence that a project is a "going concern".
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Nov 7 2012, at 18:24 , Iris Clark wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>  
>> Just thought I’d let you know that I just pushed an update to the Guide [1] (webrev [2]).  Don’t get too excited, all I did was a quick pass to remove the obviously incorrect (e.g. s/Sun/Oracle/g),  eliminate references to plans that never materialized or things that longer exist, run it through the W3C Markup Validator, and bump the version number/date.  
>>  
>> There’s still additional work that could be done.  There’s no grand plan here.  It just made me sad to see the Guide languishing for attention.
>> Thanks,
>> iris
>>  
>> [1]:  http://openjdk.java.net/guide/
>> [2]:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/guide/20121107/
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/guide-discuss/attachments/20121108/bb962afe/attachment-0001.html