From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Thu Sep  6 15:58:48 2012
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:58:48 -0700
Subject: jcheck: Request for review (S): Lax bugids
Message-ID: <20120906225848.57183856@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jcheck/lax-bugids/

This simple patch allows a .jcheck/conf file to specify that lines
starting with digits and a colon shouldn't be validated at all.

(This is needed for the JEP repo, where changeset comments often
 start with a JEP number.)

Thanks,
- Mark

From weijun.wang at oracle.com  Thu Sep  6 18:23:27 2012
From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Weijun Wang)
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:23:27 +0800
Subject: jcheck: Request for review (S): Lax bugids
In-Reply-To: <20120906225848.57183856@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20120906225848.57183856@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <50494C8F.6040008@oracle.com>

This looks fine.

But why cover JEP repo in jcheck?

Thanks
Max


On 09/07/2012 06:58 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jcheck/lax-bugids/
>
> This simple patch allows a .jcheck/conf file to specify that lines
> starting with digits and a colon shouldn't be validated at all.
>
> (This is needed for the JEP repo, where changeset comments often
>   start with a JEP number.)
>
> Thanks,
> - Mark
>

From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Fri Sep  7 07:23:36 2012
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:23:36 -0700
Subject: jcheck: Request for review (S): Lax bugids
In-Reply-To: weijun.wang@oracle.com; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:23:27 +0800;
	<50494C8F.6040008@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20120907142336.CF532AF8@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

2012/9/6 18:23 -0700, weijun.wang at oracle.com:
> But why cover JEP repo in jcheck?

To ensure that changesets contain valid author names.

- Mark

From iris.clark at oracle.com  Fri Sep  7 10:01:51 2012
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: jcheck: Request for review (S): Lax bugids
In-Reply-To: <<20120906225848.57183856@eggemoggin.niobe.net>>
References: <<20120906225848.57183856@eggemoggin.niobe.net>>
Message-ID: <8502e377-9518-4eec-81d6-1c7ced5fe695@default>

> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jcheck/lax-bugids/

Looks fine to me.

iris

From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Tue Sep 11 09:50:14 2012
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:50:14 +0000
Subject: hg: code-tools/jcheck: Lax bugids
Message-ID: <20120911165014.2BC7247A16@hg.openjdk.java.net>

Changeset: 1d922a43886c
Author:    mr
Date:      2012-09-11 09:50 -0700
URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jcheck/rev/1d922a43886c

Lax bugids

! jcheck.py
! mktests.sh
! runtests.sh


From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Tue Sep 11 09:53:05 2012
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:53:05 +0000
Subject: hg: code-tools/jcheck/dist: jcheck 1d922a43886c 2012-09-11 09:50:00
	-0700
Message-ID: <20120911165305.19C2947A17@hg.openjdk.java.net>

Changeset: f784cd98e68b
Author:    mr
Date:      2012-09-11 09:50 -0700
URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jcheck/dist/rev/f784cd98e68b

jcheck 1d922a43886c 2012-09-11 09:50:00 -0700

! jcheck.py